Documentation

Designing Broadband Matching Networks (Part 1: Antenna)

This example shows how to design a broadband matching network between a resistive source and inductive load using optimization with direct search methods.

In any system that uses RF circuits, a matching network is necessary to transfer the maximum amount of power between a source and a load. In most systems, such as wireless devices, there is a bandwidth of operation specified. As a result the purpose of the matching network is to provide maximum power transfer over a range of frequencies. While the L section matching approach (conjugate match), guarantees maximum power transfer, it does so only at a single frequency. Figure 1: Impedance matching of an antenna to a source

Specify Frequency and Impedance

You are building a matching network with a bandpass response, so specify the center frequency and the bandwidth of match.

fc = 350e6;                           % Center Frequency (Hz)
BW = 110e6;                           % Bandwidth (Hz)

Here you specify the source impedance, the reference impedance and the load resistance. In this example the load Zl is modeled as a series R-L circuit. You could instead measure the impedance of the load and use that directly.

Zs = 50;                              % Source impedance (ohm)
Z0 = 50;                              % Reference impedance (ohm)
Rl = 40;                              % Load resistance (ohm)
L = 12e-8;                            % Load inductance (Henry)

Define the number of frequency points to use for analysis and set up the frequency vector.

nfreq = 256;                          % Number of frequency points
fLower = fc - (BW/2);                 % Lower band edge
fUpper = fc + (BW/2);                 % Upper band edge
freq = linspace(fLower,fUpper,nfreq); % Frequency array for analysis
w = 2*pi*freq;                        % Frequency (radians/sec)

Understand Load Behavior using Reflection Coefficient and Power Gain

You then use two simple expressions for calculating the load reflection coefficient and the power gain. This corresponds to directly connecting the source to the antenna input terminals i.e. in Figure 1 there is no matching network.

Xl = w*L;                                   % Reactance (ohm)
Zl = Rl + 1i*Xl;                            % Load impedance (ohm)
GammaL = (Zl - Z0)./(Zl + Z0);              % Load reflection coefficient
unmatchedGt = 10*log10(1 - abs(GammaL).^2); % Power delivered to load

Use the smithplot function to plot the variation in the load reflection coefficient with frequency. An input reflection coefficient closer to center of the Smith chart means a better matching performance. This plot shows that the load reflection coefficient is far away from this point. Therefore, there is an impedance mismatch.

figure
hs = smithplot(GammaL);
hs.LegendLabels = {'#Gamma load'}; You can confirm this mismatch by plotting the transducer gain as a function of frequency.

plot(freq.*1e-6,unmatchedGt,'r')
grid on
title('Power delivered to load - No matching network')
xlabel('Frequency (MHz)')
ylabel('Magnitude (decibels)')
legend('G_t','Location','Best') As the plot shows, there is approximately 10 dB power loss around the desired region of operation (295 - 405 MHz). As a result, the antenna needs a matching network that operates over a 110 MHz bandwidth that is centered at 350 MHz.

Design the Matching Network

The matching network must operate between 295 MHz and 405 MHz, so you choose a bandpass topology for the matching network which is shown here.

Type - I: Series LC first element followed by shunt LC Figure 2: Matching network topology

The approach is to design an odd order 0.5 dB Chebyshev lowpass prototype and then apply a lowpass to bandpass transformation  to obtain the initial design for the matching network shown in figure 2. You now need to enter the order desired and the associated coefficients. This is a single match problem , i.e. the source is purely resistive while load is a combination of R and L, so you can begin by choosing a five element prototype network.

N = 5;                                          % Order of matching network
LCproto = [1.7058 1.2296 2.5408 1.2296 1.7058]; % Lowpass prototype values (Normalized)
wU = 2*pi*fUpper;                               % Upper band edge
wL = 2*pi*fLower;                               % Lower band edge
w0 = sqrt(wL*wU);                               % Geometric mean

Use the lcladder object to build the bandpass tee matching network. The impedance and frequency transformations are included for denormalization purposes. Please note that the topology demands a bandpass tee prototype that begins with a series inductor. If the topology chosen is an LC bandpass pi then you would begin with shunt C for the lowpass prototype.

Lvals = zeros(N,1);
Cvals = zeros(N,1);

Lvals(1:2:end) = LCproto(1:2:end).*Zs./(wU-wL);            % Series L's (H)
Cvals(1:2:end) = (wU-wL)./(Zs.*(w0^2).*LCproto(1:2:end));  % Series C's (F)

Lvals(2:2:end) = ((wU-wL)*Zs)./((w0^2).*LCproto(2:2:end)); % Shunt L's (H)
Cvals(2:2:end) = LCproto(2:2:end)./((wU-wL).*Zs);          % Shunt C's (F)

% Create the matching network

% Copy initial values for comparison
L_initial = Lvals;

Optimize the Designed Matching Network

There are several points to consider prior to the optimization

• Objective function - The objective function can be built in different ways depending on the problem at hand. For this example, the objective function is shown in the file below.

• Choice of cost function - The cost function is the function we would like to minimize (maximize) to achieve near optimal performance. There could be several ways to choose the cost function. One obvious choice is the input reflection coefficient, gammaIn. In this example we have chosen to minimize the average reflection coefficient in the passband.

• Optimization variables - In this case it is a vector of values, for the specific elements to optimize in the matching network.

• Optimization method - A direct search based technique, the MATLAB® function fminsearch, is used in this example to perform the optimization.

• Number of iterations/function evaluations - Set the maximum number of iterations and function evaluations to perform, so as to tradeoff between speed and quality of match.

The objective function used during the optimization process by fminsearch is shown here.

type('antennaMatchObjectiveFun.m')
function output = antennaMatchObjectiveFun(matchingNW,Lvalues,freq,ZL,Z0)
%ANTENNAMATCHOBJECTIVEFUN is the objective function used by the example
% Designing Broadband Matching Networks (Part I: Antenna), which can be
% found in broadband_match_antenna.m.
%
% OUTPUT = ANTENNAMATCHOBJECTIVEFUN(MATCHINGNW,LVALUES,FREQ,Z0)
% returns the current value of the objective function stored in OUTPUT
% evaluated after updating the inductor values in the object, MATCHINGNW.
% The inductor values are stored in the variable LVALUES.
%
% ANTENNAMATCHOBJECTIVEFUN is an objective function of RF Toolbox demo:
% Designing Broadband Matching Networks (Part I: Antenna)

%   Copyright 2008-2015 The MathWorks, Inc.

% Ensure positive element values
if any(Lvalues <= 0)
output = Inf;
return
end

% Update the element values in the matching network
matchingNW.Inductances(1) = Lvalues(1);
matchingNW.Inductances(end) = Lvalues(end);

% Perform analysis on tuned matching network
S = sparameters(matchingNW,freq,Z0);

% Calculate input reflection coefficient 'gammaIn'
gIn = gammain(S,ZL);

% Cost function
output = mean(abs(gIn));

% Other possible choices for objective function could be : -
% output =  max(abs(gIn));
% output = -1*mean(Gt_pass);

% Animate
hs = smithplot(gIn);
% l.LegendLabels = 'Optimizing #Gamma in';
drawnow

There are several ways to choose the cost function and some options are shown within the objective function above (in comments). The optimization variables are the first and last inductors, L1 and L5 respectively. The element values are stored in the variable L_Optimized.

niter = 125;
options = optimset('Display','iter','MaxIter',niter);  % Set options structure
L_Optimized = [Lvals(1) Lvals(end)];
L_Optimized = ...
fminsearch(@(L_Optimized)antennaMatchObjectiveFun(matchingNW, ...
L_Optimized,freq,Zl,Z0),L_Optimized,options);

Iteration   Func-count     min f(x)         Procedure
0            1         0.933981
1            3         0.933981         initial simplex
2            5         0.920321         expand
3            7         0.911351         expand
4            9         0.853251         expand
5           11         0.730432         expand
6           13         0.526433         reflect
7           15         0.526433         contract inside
8           17         0.421086         reflect
9           19         0.421086         contract inside
10           20         0.421086         reflect
11           22         0.421086         contract inside
12           24         0.421086         contract inside
13           26         0.339941         expand
14           27         0.339941         reflect
15           29         0.285288         reflect
16           31         0.285288         contract inside
17           32         0.285288         reflect
18           34         0.283533         reflect
19           36         0.283533         contract inside
20           38         0.278945         contract inside
21           40         0.278134         reflect
22           41         0.278134         reflect
23           43         0.276368         contract inside
24           45         0.275793         contract inside
25           47         0.275646         contract inside
26           49         0.275509         reflect
27           51         0.275292         contract inside
28           52         0.275292         reflect
29           54         0.275292         contract inside
30           56         0.275292         contract inside

Optimization terminated:
the current x satisfies the termination criteria using OPTIONS.TolX of 1.000000e-04
and F(X) satisfies the convergence criteria using OPTIONS.TolFun of 1.000000e-04 Update the Matching Network Elements with Optimal Values

When the optimization routine stops, the optimized element values are stored in L_Optimized. The following code updates the input and output matching network with these values.

matchingNW.Inductances(1) = L_Optimized(1);     % Update the matching network inductor L1
matchingNW.Inductances(end) = L_Optimized(end); % Update the matching network inductor L5

Analyze and Display Optimization Results

Compare and plot the input reflection coefficient of the matched and unmatched results.

hold all
hs = smithplot(GammaL);
hs.LegendLabels = {'#Gamma in (Matched)','#Gamma in (Unmatched)'};
hold off The optimized matching network improves the performance of the circuit. In the passband (295 MHz to 405 MHz), the input reflection coefficient is closer to the center of the Smith chart.

Plot the power delivered to load for both the matched and unmatched system.

S = sparameters(matchingNW,freq,Z0);
matchedGt = powergain(S,Zs,Zl,'Gt');
figure;
plot(freq*1e-6,matchedGt)
hold all
plot(freq*1e-6,unmatchedGt,'r')
grid on
hold off
title('Power delivered to load')
legend('Optimized network','No matching network','Location','Best'); The power delivered to the load is approximately 1 dB down for the optimized matching network.

Display Optimized Element Values

The following code shows the initial and optimized values for inductors L1 and L5.

L1_Initial = L_initial(1)
L1_Optimized = L_Optimized(1)
L1_Initial =

1.2340e-07

L1_Optimized =

1.2111e-07

L5_Initial = L_initial(end)
L5_Optimized = L_Optimized(end)
L5_Initial =

1.2340e-07

L5_Optimized =

1.7557e-09

There are a few things to consider when setting up an optimization:

• Choosing a different objective function would change the result.

• You can use advanced direct search optimization functions such as patternsearch and simulannealband in your optimization, but you must have the Global Optimization Toolbox installed to access them.

A Low noise amplifier design example is covered in the second example Designing Broadband Matching Networks (Part 2: Amplifier).

References

 RF Circuit Design, Theory and Applications, Reinhold Ludwig and P. Bretchko, pp 229-239,Prentice Hall, 2000.

 Microwave Engineering, David M. Pozar, 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, 1999.

 Broadband Direct-Coupled and Matching RF networks, Thomas R. Cuthbert, pp 31-33, TRCPEP, 1999.