How can I perform matrix operation efficiently?

3 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Ranjan Sonalkar
Ranjan Sonalkar le 4 Juin 2014
Commenté : Dan Gianotti le 22 Juil 2014
I have an array X(n,m) where m<<n and n can be very large. First, I want to create a 3-d array of dimension (m,m,n) such that each mxm matrix in the nth location is the outer product of the n-th m-dimensional row in the original X- array.
Then I want to form a weighted sum all the mxm arrays where the weights are the elements of another n-dimensional array, Y(n).
result=zeros(m);
for i=1:n
result = result + Y(i) * X(i,:)' * X(i,:);
end
I could do this in the loop, but I think it would be slow when n is very large, compared to if there were a way to do all this with some matrix operation functions in MATLAB.
  3 commentaires
dpb
dpb le 4 Juin 2014
Needs to preallocate the full 3D array, however, and store into it; otherwise it'll be the classic case of reallocation and memory thrashing as he adds planes.
That said, I'd think it likely to be reasonably-decent performing. The alternatives seem to be accumarray and the like which are basically loops themselves...
Dan Gianotti
Dan Gianotti le 22 Juil 2014
Hah! This is exactly the question I was about to ask (presumably implementing some version of the EM algorithm?)!
Did you determine if Roger's loop or James's vectorized version was faster?

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Réponse acceptée

Roger Stafford
Roger Stafford le 5 Juin 2014
If m is much smaller than n and assuming Y is a column vector, try this:
R = zeros(m);
TX = X';
for ix = 1:m
R(:,ix) = TX*(X(:,ix).*Y); % <-- R is 'result'
end
  1 commentaire
Ranjan Sonalkar
Ranjan Sonalkar le 5 Juin 2014
Thanks. Very nice. I was doing a loop on n (10000). I changed it to your code to loop on m (3) and this part of the code ran 600 times faster.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Plus de réponses (1)

James Tursa
James Tursa le 4 Juin 2014
Modifié(e) : James Tursa le 4 Juin 2014
This is vectorized, but it creates potentially large intermediate arrays, so I don't know if it will be any faster than your simple loop. Strictly from a memory use perspective, the simple loop is better.
XT = X';
XTc = reshape(XT,m,1,n);
XTr = reshape(XT,1,m,n);
XTX = bsxfun(@times,XTc,XTr);
Yn = reshape(Y,1,1,n);
YXTX = bsxfun(@times,Yn,XTX);
result = sum(YXTX,3);

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Creating and Concatenating Matrices dans Help Center et File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by