Why Index exceeds the number of array elements (1) if I change the input order in the anonymous function?
1 vue (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
Here is the funciton:
function [Y] = d_o(X,t,m,k,c)
x = X(1);
y = X(2);
Y(1,1)=y;
Y(2,1)=1/m*(-k*x-c*y);
end
Here is the script:
T = 0:0.1:100;
y0 = [0.1,1];
m = 1; k = 0.1; c = 0.05;
d_o_an = @(X,t) d_o(X,t,m,k,c);
[tout,yout] = ode45(d_o_an,T,y0);
plot(tout, yout);
I think the problem is in the anonymous function, if I change @(X,t) to @(t,X), the code can run. But why?
Réponse acceptée
Jan
le 24 Nov 2020
ode45 calls the function to be integrated as f(t, Y) . So the time must be the first input.
Plus de réponses (0)
Voir également
Catégories
En savoir plus sur Matrix Indexing dans Help Center et File Exchange
Produits
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!