I can't believe I used a trick I learned from Javascript...
I tried to optimize my solution as much possible as I could, still my code size was 45, any idea what would be there in the leading solution of this problem which has code size as 11 ? Which trick did you use?
Test | Status | Code Input and Output |
---|---|---|
1 | Pass |
%%
a = [ ...
1 2 0 0 0
0 0 5 0 0
2 7 0 0 0
0 6 9 3 3];
r_correct = 4;
assert(isequal(fullest_row(a),r_correct))
|
2 | Pass |
%%
a = [ ...
1 2 0 0
0 0 5 0
0 6 9 -3
2 7 0 0
0 0 0 0];
r_correct = 3;
assert(isequal(fullest_row(a),r_correct))
|
3 | Pass |
%%
a = [ ...
1 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 2 3];
r_correct = 5;
assert(isequal(fullest_row(a),r_correct))
|
4 | Pass |
%%
a = [ ...
0
0
0
-3
0
0];
r_correct = 4;
assert(isequal(fullest_row(a),r_correct))
|
874 Solvers
3375 Solvers
306 Solvers
530 Solvers
277 Solvers
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!