Note: This page has been translated by MathWorks. Click here to see

To view all translated materials including this page, select Country from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

To view all translated materials including this page, select Country from the country navigator on the bottom of this page.

This example shows how to avoid calling a function twice when it computes values for both the objective and the constraints using the problem-based approach. For the solver-based approach, see Objective and Nonlinear Constraints in the Same Function.

You typically use such a function in a simulation. Solvers usually evaluate the objective and nonlinear constraint functions separately. This evaluation is wasteful when you use the same calculation for both results.

This example also shows the effect of parallel computation on solver speed. For time-consuming functions, computing in parallel can speed the solver, as can avoiding calling the time-consuming function repeatedly at the same point. Using both techniques together speeds the solver the most.

The `computeall`

function returns outputs that are part of the objective and nonlinear constraints.

`type computeall`

function [f1,c1] = computeall(x) c1 = norm(x)^2 - 1; f1 = 100*(x(2) - x(1)^2)^2 + (1 - x(1))^2; pause(1) % simulate expensive computation end

The function includes a `pause(1)`

statement to simulate a time-consuming function.

This problem uses a four-element optimization variable.

`x = optimvar('x',4);`

`'ReuseEvaluation'`

Convert the `computeall`

function to an optimization expression. To save time during the optimization, use the `'ReuseEvaluation'`

name-value pair. To save time for the solver to determine the output expression sizes (this happens only once), set the `'OutputSize'`

name-value pair to `[1 1]`

, indicating that both `f`

and `c`

are scalar`.`

[f,c] = fcn2optimexpr(@computeall,x,'ReuseEvaluation',true,'OutputSize',[1 1]);

Create the objective function from the `f`

expression.

obj = f + 20*(x(3) - x(4)^2)^2 + 5*(1 - x(4))^2;

Create the nonlinear inequality constraint from the `c`

expression.

cons = c <= 0;

Create an optimization problem and include the objective and constraint.

```
prob = optimproblem('Objective',obj);
prob.Constraints.cons = cons;
showproblem(prob)
```

OptimizationProblem : minimize : ((arg3 + (20 .* (x(3) - x(4).^2).^2)) + (5 .* (1 - x(4)).^2)) where: [arg3,~] = generatedFunction_computeall_withReuse(x); subject to cons: arg_LHS <= 0 where: [~,arg_LHS] = generatedFunction_computeall_withReuse(x);

Monitor the time it takes to solve the problem starting from the initial point `x0.x = [-1;1;1;2]`

.

```
x0.x = [-1;1;1;2];
x0.x = x0.x/norm(x0.x); % Feasible initial point
tic
[sol,fval,exitflag,output] = solve(prob,x0)
```

Local minimum found that satisfies the constraints. Optimization completed because the objective function is non-decreasing in feasible directions, to within the value of the optimality tolerance, and constraints are satisfied to within the value of the constraint tolerance. <stopping criteria details>

`sol = `*struct with fields:*
x: [4×1 double]

fval = 0.7107

exitflag = OptimalSolution

`output = `*struct with fields:*
iterations: 25
funcCount: 149
constrviolation: 0
stepsize: 1.3715e-07
algorithm: 'interior-point'
firstorderopt: 4.0000e-07
cgiterations: 7
message: '↵Local minimum found that satisfies the constraints.↵↵Optimization completed because the objective function is non-decreasing in ↵feasible directions, to within the value of the optimality tolerance,↵and constraints are satisfied to within the value of the constraint tolerance.↵↵<stopping criteria details>↵↵Optimization completed: The relative first-order optimality measure, 2.909695e-07,↵is less than options.OptimalityTolerance = 1.000000e-06, and the relative maximum constraint↵violation, 0.000000e+00, is less than options.ConstraintTolerance = 1.000000e-06.↵↵'
solver: 'fmincon'

time1 = toc

time1 = 149.8888

The number of seconds for the solution is just over the number of function evaluations, which indicates that the solver computed each evaluation only once.

`fprintf("The number of seconds to solve was %g, and the number of evaluation points was %g.\n",time1,output.funcCount)`

The number of seconds to solve was 149.889, and the number of evaluation points was 149.

If, instead, you do not call `fcn2optimexpr`

using `'ReuseEvaluation'`

, then the solution time doubles.

[f2,c2] = fcn2optimexpr(@computeall,x,'ReuseEvaluation',false); obj2 = f2 + 20*(x(3) - x(4)^2)^2 + 5*(1 - x(4))^2; cons2 = c2 <= 0; prob2 = optimproblem('Objective',obj2); prob2.Constraints.cons2 = cons2; tic [sol2,fval2,exitflag2,output2] = solve(prob2,x0);

Local minimum found that satisfies the constraints. Optimization completed because the objective function is non-decreasing in feasible directions, to within the value of the optimality tolerance, and constraints are satisfied to within the value of the constraint tolerance. <stopping criteria details>

time2 = toc

time2 = 298.4074

If you have a Parallel Processing Toolbox™ license, you can save even more time by computing in parallel. To do so, set options to use parallel processing, and call `solve`

with options.

options = optimoptions(prob,'UseParallel',true); tic [sol3,fval3,exitflag3,output3] = solve(prob,x0,'Options',options);

Local minimum found that satisfies the constraints. Optimization completed because the objective function is non-decreasing in feasible directions, to within the value of the optimality tolerance, and constraints are satisfied to within the value of the constraint tolerance. <stopping criteria details>

time3 = toc

time3 = 74.0615

Using parallel processing and `'ReuseEvaluation'`

together provides a faster solution than using `'ReuseEvaluation'`

alone. See how long it takes to solve the problem using parallel processing alone.

```
tic
[sol4,fval4,exitflag4,output4] = solve(prob2,x0,'Options',options);
```

time4 = toc

time4 = 144.6696

Combine the timing results into one table.

timingtable = table([time1;time2;time3;time4],... 'RowNames',["Reuse Serial";"No Reuse Serial";"Reuse Parallel";"No Reuse Parallel"])

`timingtable=`*4×1 table*
Var1
______
Reuse Serial 149.89
No Reuse Serial 298.41
Reuse Parallel 74.062
No Reuse Parallel 144.67

For this problem, on a computer with a 6-core processor, computing in parallel takes about half the time of computing in serial, and computing with `'ReuseEvaluation'`

takes about half the time of computing without `'ReuseEvaluation'`

. Computing in parallel with `'ReuseEvaluation'`

takes about a quarter of the time of computing in serial without `'ReuseEvaluation'`

.