Main Content

This example discusses the detection of a deterministic signal in complex, white, Gaussian noise. This situation is frequently encountered in radar, sonar and communication applications.

There are many different kinds of detectors available for use in different applications. A few of the most popular ones are the Bayesian detector, maximum likelihood (ML) detector and Neyman-Pearson (NP) detector. In radar and sonar applications, NP is the most popular choice since it can ensure the probability of false alarm (*Pfa*) to be at a certain level.

In this example, we limit our discussion to the scenario where the signal is deterministic and the noise is white and Gaussian distributed. Both signal and noise are complex.

The example discusses the following topics and their interrelations: coherent detection, noncoherent detection, matched filtering and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

The received signal is assumed to follow the model

$$x(t)=s(t)+n(t)$$

where *s(t)* is the signal and *n(t)* is the noise. Without losing the generality, we assume that the signal power is equal to 1 watt and the noise power is determined accordingly based on the signal to noise ratio (SNR). For example, for an SNR of 10 dB, the noise power, i.e., noise variance will be 0.1 watt.

A matched filter is often used at the receiver front end to enhance the SNR. From the discrete signal point of view, matched filter coefficients are simply given by the complex conjugated reversed signal samples.

When dealing with complex signals and noises, there are two types of receivers. The first kind is a coherent receiver, which assumes that both the amplitude and phase of the received signal are known. This results in a perfect match between the matched filter coefficients and the signal *s*. Therefore, the matched filter coefficients can be considered as the conjugate of *s*. The matched filter operation can then be modeled as

$$y={s}^{*}x={s}^{*}(s+n)=|s{|}^{2}+{s}^{*}n\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}.$$

Note that although the general output *y* is still a complex quantity, the signal is completely characterized by $$|s{|}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}},$$ which is a real number and contained in the real part of *y*. Hence, the detector following the matched filter in a coherent receiver normally uses only the real part of the received signal. Such a receiver can normally provide the best performance. However, the coherent receiver is vulnerable to phase errors. In addition, a coherent receiver also requires additional hardware to perform the phase detection. For a noncoherent receiver, the received signal is modeled as a copy of the original signal with a random phase error. With a noncoherent received signal, the detection after the matched filter is normally based on the power or magnitude of the signal since you need both real and imaginary parts to completely define the signal.

The objective function of the NP decision rule can be written as

$$J={P}_{d}+g({P}_{fa}-a),$$

i.e., to maximize the probability of the detection, *Pd*, while limiting the probability of false alarm, *Pfa* at a specified level *a*. The variable *g* in the equation is the Lagrange multiplier. The NP detector can be formed as a likelihood ratio test (LRT) as follows:

$$\frac{{p}_{y}(y|{H}_{1})}{{p}_{y}(y|{H}_{0})}\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{{H}_{1}}{>}}{\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{<}{{H}_{0}}}Th\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}.$$

In this particular NP situation, since the false alarm is caused by the noise alone, the threshold *Th* is determined by the noise to ensure the fixed *Pfa*. The general form of the LRT shown above is often difficult to evaluate. In real applications, we often use an easy to compute quantity from the signal, i.e., sufficient statistic, to replace the ratio of two probability density functions. For example, the sufficient statistics, *z* may be as simple as

$$z=\left|y\right|\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}},$$

then the simplified detector becomes

$$z\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{{H}_{1}}{>}}{\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{<}{{H}_{0}}}T\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}.$$

*T* is the threshold to the sufficient statistic *z*, acting just like the threshold *Th* to the LRT. Therefore, the threshold is not only related to the probability distributions, but also depends on the choice of sufficient statistic.

We will first explore an example of detecting a signal in noise using just one sample.

Assume the signal is a unit power sample and the SNR is 3 dB. Using a 100000-trial Monte-Carlo simulation, we generate the signal and noise as

% fix the random number generator rstream = RandStream.create('mt19937ar','seed',2009); Ntrial = 1e5; % number of Monte-Carlo trials snrdb = 3; % SNR in dB snr = db2pow(snrdb); % SNR in linear scale spower = 1; % signal power is 1 npower = spower/snr; % noise power namp = sqrt(npower/2); % noise amplitude in each channel s = ones(1,Ntrial); % signal n = namp*(randn(rstream,1,Ntrial)+1i*randn(rstream,1,Ntrial)); % noise

Note that the noise is complex, white and Gaussian distributed.

If the received signal contains the target, it is given by

x = s + n;

The matched filter in this case is trivial, since the signal itself is a unit sample.

mf = 1;

In this case, the matched filter gain is 1, therefore, there is no SNR gain.

Now we do the detection and examine the performance of the detector. For a coherent receiver, the received signal after the matched filter is given by

`y = mf'*x; % apply the matched filter`

The sufficient statistic, i.e., the value used to compare to the detection threshold, for a coherent detector is the real part of the received signal after the matched filter, i.e.,

z = real(y);

Let's assume that the we want to fix the Pfa to 1e-3. Given the sufficient statistic, *z*, the decision rule becomes

$$z\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{{H}_{1}}{>}}{\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{<}{{H}_{0}}}T$$

where the threshold *T* is related to *Pfa* as

$${P}_{fa}=\frac{1}{2}[1-erf\left(\frac{T}{\sqrt{NM}}\right)]$$

In the equation, *N* is the signal power and *M* is the matched filter gain. Note that *T* is the threshold of the signal after the matched filter and *NM* represents the noise power after the matched filter, so $$\frac{T}{\sqrt{NM}}$$ can be considered as the ratio between the signal and noise magnitude, i.e., it is related to the signal to noise ratio, SNR. Since SNR is normally referred to as the ratio between the signal and noise power, considering the units of each quantity in this expression, we can see that

$$\frac{T}{\sqrt{NM}}=\sqrt{SNR}\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}.$$

Since *N* and *M* are fixed once the noise and signal waveform are chosen, there is a correspondence between *T* and SNR. Given T is a threshold of the signal, SNR can be considered as a threshold of the signal to noise ratio. Therefore, the threshold equation can then be rewritten in the form of

$${P}_{fa}=\frac{1}{2}[1-erf\left(\sqrt{SNR}\right)].$$

The required SNR threshold given a complex, white Gaussian noise for the NP detector can be calculated using the npwgnthresh function as follows:

```
Pfa = 1e-3;
snrthreshold = db2pow(npwgnthresh(Pfa, 1,'coherent'));
```

Note that this threshold, although also in the form of an SNR value, is different to the SNR of the received signal. The threshold SNR is a calculated value based on the desired detection performance, in this case the *Pfa*; while the received signal SNR is the physical characteristic of the signal determined by the propagation environment, the waveform, the transmit power, etc.

The true threshold *T* can then be derived from this SNR threshold as

$$T=\sqrt{NM}\cdot \sqrt{SNR}.$$

mfgain = mf'*mf; % To match the equation in the text above % npower - N % mfgain - M % snrthreshold - SNR threshold = sqrt(npower*mfgain*snrthreshold);

The detection is performed by comparing the signal to the threshold. Since the original signal, *s*, is presented in the received signal, a successful detection occurs when the received signal passes the threshold, i.e. *z>T*. The capability of the detector to detect a target is often measured by the *Pd*. In a Monte-Carlo simulation, *Pd* can be calculated as the ratio between the number of times the signal passes the threshold and the number of total trials.

Pd = sum(z>threshold)/Ntrial

Pd = 0.1390

On the other hand, a false alarm occurs when the detection shows that there is a target but there actually isn't one, i.e., the received signal passes the threshold when there is only noise present. The error probability of the detector to detect a target when there isn't one is given by *Pfa*.

x = n; y = mf'*x; z = real(y); Pfa = sum(z>threshold)/Ntrial

Pfa = 9.0000e-04

which meets our requirement.

To see the relation among SNR, *Pd* and *Pfa* in a graph, we can plot the theoretical ROC curve using the rocsnr function for a SNR value of 3 dB as

rocsnr(snrdb,'SignalType','NonfluctuatingCoherent','MinPfa',1e-4);

It can be seen from the figure that the measured *Pd*=0.1390 and *Pfa*=0.0009 obtained above for the SNR value of 3 dB match a theoretical point on the ROC curve.

A noncoherent receiver does not know the phase of the received signal, therefore, for target present case, the signal x contains a phase term and is defined as

```
% simulate the signal
x = s.*exp(1i*2*pi*rand(rstream,1,Ntrial)) + n;
y = mf'*x;
```

When the noncoherent receiver is used, the quantity used to compare with the threshold is the power (or magnitude) of the received signal after the matched filter. In this simulation, we choose the magnitude as the sufficient statistic.

z = abs(y);

Given our choice of the sufficient statistic *z*, the threshold is related to *Pfa* by the equation

$${P}_{fa}=exp(-\frac{{T}^{2}}{NM})=exp(-SNR)\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}.$$

The signal to noise ratio threshold SNR for an NP detector can be calculated using npwgnthresh as follows:

`snrthreshold = db2pow(npwgnthresh(Pfa, 1,'noncoherent'));`

The threshold, *T*, is derived from SNR as before

mfgain = mf'*mf; threshold = sqrt(npower*mfgain*snrthreshold);

Again, *Pd* can then be obtained using

Pd = sum(z>threshold)/Ntrial

Pd = 0.0583

Note that this resulting *Pd* is inferior to the performance we get from a coherent receiver.

For the target absent case, the received signal contains only noise. We can calculate the *Pfa* using Monte-Carlo simulation as

x = n; y = mf'*x; z = abs(y); Pfa = sum(z>threshold)/Ntrial

Pfa = 9.5000e-04

The ROC curve for a noncoherent receiver is plotted as

rocsnr(snrdb,'SignalType','NonfluctuatingNoncoherent','MinPfa',1e-4);

We can see that the performance of the noncoherent receiver detector is inferior to that of the coherent receiver.

This example shows how to simulate and perform different detection techniques using MATLAB®. The example illustrates the relationship among several frequently encountered variables in signal detection, namely, probability of detection (*Pd*), probability of false alarm (*Pfa*) and signal to noise ratio (SNR). In particular, the example calculates the performance of the detector using Monte-Carlo simulations and verifies the results of the metrics with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

There are two SNR values we encounter in detecting a signal. The first one is the SNR of a single data sample. This is the SNR value appeared in a ROC curve plot. A point on ROC gives the required single sample SNR necessary to achieve the corresponding *Pd* and *Pfa*. However, it is NOT the SNR threshold used for detection. Using the Neyman-Pearson decision rule, the SNR threshold, the second SNR value we see in the detection, is determined by the noise distribution and the desired *Pfa* level. Therefore, such an SNR threshold indeed corresponds to the *Pfa* axis in a ROC curve. If we fix the SNR of a single sample, as depicted in the above ROC curve plots, each point on the curve will correspond to a *Pfa* value, which in turn translates to an SNR threshold value. Using this particular SNR threshold to perform the detection will then result in the corresponding *Pd*.

Note that an SNR threshold may not be the threshold used directly in the actual detector. The actual detector normally uses an easy to compute sufficient statistic quantity to perform the detection. Thus, the true threshold has to be derived from the aforementioned SNR threshold accordingly so that it is consistent with the choice of sufficient statistics.

This example performs the detection using only one received signal sample. Hence, the resulting *Pd* is fairly low and there is no processing gain achieved by the matched filter. To improve *Pd* and to take advantage of the processing gain of the matched filter, we can use multiple samples, or even multiple pulses, of the received signal. For more information about how to detect a signal using multiple samples or pulses, please refer to the example Signal Detection Using Multiple Samples.