# of counts in whole image vs #counts in masked image +mask? shoul be same or not???
2 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
Dear all,
I did histograms of :
1. whole image
2. image masked
3. image with inverted masked
I would expect sum of counts in 2+3 shall be same as in 1. But it is not. So is this because of the mask line width (I do masking with imfreehand).. and double assigning of some pixels to masked and reversed masked region?, or is my procedure somehow wrong. Scheme is as follows
masked_image=whole_image.*mask;
inverse_masked_image=whole_image.*(~mask)
the numbers differ like 1=65536, and(2+3)=78086..
thanks!
4 commentaires
Image Analyst
le 17 Mai 2014
I don't have that image. Can you illustrate with a standard demo image like cameraman.tif or something?
Réponse acceptée
Image Analyst
le 17 Mai 2014
All images are the same size (unless you cropped them), so all images should have the same number of counts . The fact that some pixels have been set to 0 or 255 (masked) does not affect the number of pixels they have and so the count from imhist() or hist() or histc() will be the same, which is numel(grayImage).
Plus de réponses (0)
Voir également
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!