How to index on a loop for first occurrence?

Hi,
I have a set of data which I would like to loop through for each row.
I would like for every row, the first occurrence of a one to cause all other subsequent values in that row to be replaced by a zero.
Does anybody have any advice on how I could go about doing this?
Thanks

Réponses (2)

Andrei Bobrov
Andrei Bobrov le 1 Juin 2015
Modifié(e) : Andrei Bobrov le 1 Juin 2015
a = [1 0 1 0 0 0 1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0]
out = cumsum(a==1,2)==1 & a==1;

10 commentaires

Chameleon17
Chameleon17 le 1 Juin 2015
Modifié(e) : Walter Roberson le 1 Juin 2015
Hello!
Thank you for that! but unfortunately it is still giving me the same response as last time, a 1 for R1C1 and everything else just zeros..
Chameleon17
Chameleon17 le 1 Juin 2015
Is there a way perhaps to just store every row separately, it would be easier to code that way right?
Adam
Adam le 1 Juin 2015
It works fine for me.
You may want to wrap it in a cast to double depending what you want to do with the output as it returns a logical array, but for many purposes a logical array will serve you better anyway.
small example
>> a = [0 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 1 0 1
1 0 0 1];
>> out = cumsum(a==1,2)==1 & a==1
out =
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
>>
Here all right?
Chameleon17
Chameleon17 le 1 Juin 2015
Okay, yes your example works fine for me, so it's something on my end. It's good to know that it WILL work eventually though! I don't think I understand it though, which isn't good. ==1 & a ==1? What is this saying?
Thanks!
Adam
Adam le 1 Juin 2015
Modifié(e) : Adam le 1 Juin 2015
should help understand the use of & as an element-wise logical operator. Note that this is different to && which expects scalar operands to AND together into a result.
gives similar information on the == operator's usage.
It did take me quite a while trying to find these in the help because an operator is too short to use as a search term, but they are all under the Language Fundamentals section of the main help.
Chameleon17
Chameleon17 le 2 Juin 2015
Ah this is very helpful! Thanks!
Chameleon17
Chameleon17 le 9 Sep 2015
Modifié(e) : Walter Roberson le 9 Sep 2015
Hello Again,
I'm looking over this and I'm still a bit confused.
out = cumsum(a==1,2)==1 & a==1
I understand that the & will replace a 1 if it's true and 0 if it's false. How do you know that it will run during the cumsum(a==1,2)==1. Why does the & ==1 not return a true value for all the values of 1 in each row? Not that I want it to do that. I'm just trying to understand what it's doing.
Thanks
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson le 9 Sep 2015
Modifié(e) : Walter Roberson le 9 Sep 2015
The ==1 examines each element independently. It does not process row by row.
The & will result in 1 if both values are true, and 0 otherwise. It is a binary operator. The cumsum(a==1,2)==1 part is going to create a logical matrix the same size as "a" and the a==1 part is going to create a logical matrix the same size as "a", and then the & is going to compare corresponding elements one at a time, returning true only if both are set. Another way of writing the code would be
L1 = cumsum(a==1,2)==1;
L2 = a==1;
out = false(size(L1));
for K = 1 : size(L1,2)
for J = 1 : size(L1,1)
out(J,K) = L1(J,K) & L2(J,K);
end
end
In the case where "a" contains only 0 and 1, then the code could be shorter:
out = cumsum(a,2)==1 & a;
or
out = (cumsum(a,2)==1) .* a;
If "a" can contain values other than 0 and 1, then none of the posted versions in this sub-thread are correct. I would need to think more about a good solution for that case.
Chameleon17
Chameleon17 le 9 Sep 2015
Thank you! That helps a lot!

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Adam
Adam le 1 Juin 2015
idx = find( x == 1, 1 );
x( (idx + 1):end ) = 0;
will do this for an array x. I will leave it up to you to make the trivial change to do it in a loop.

7 commentaires

Hi! Thank you very much for the help! I get the idea of what it's doing and I am trying to not have it work in a loop. It only seems to work for column one, row one, after that everything is a zero.
Original:
1 0 1 0 0 0 1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 1
0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0
After:
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Is there a way to make it read through each row individually?
Thank you again!
Chameleon17
Chameleon17 le 1 Juin 2015
I have tried to specify the rows it needs to work through for the data, but that didn't help either.
I apologize if my questions are extremely simple, I'm very new to this, but I have a lot to learn in a short space of time with MatLab and I keep getting stuck, so yes, any help is very much appreciated :)
idx = find( SP_Square_3(1:28,:) == 1, 1 )
SP_Square_3( (idx + 1):end ) = 0
Adam
Adam le 1 Juin 2015
Modifié(e) : Adam le 1 Juin 2015
Yes, it definitely won't work without the loop, but your original question suggested you wanted to use a loop to do this so something like this (untested on command line so could be a syntax error. nRows and x are just for pseudo code for you to replace with real data)
for n = 1:nRows
idx = find( x(n,:) == 1, 1 );
x( n,(idx + 1):end ) = 0;
end
Andrei's solution appears to work fine for me for not using a for loop and does actually look similar to a solution I gave to a similar question a while ago so it is a solution I like.
In general though, if speed is not an issue then the question of whether to use a loop or some other alternative that doesn't use a loop is a matter of preference where readability is often the most important factor.
If, when you come back to your own code a week later, you can no longer understand what it is doing because it uses unintuitive methods then it probably isn't worth it.
Obviously if the for loop is slow then finding an alternative is important.
Chameleon17
Chameleon17 le 1 Juin 2015
Modifié(e) : Walter Roberson le 9 Sep 2015
Hi,
Okay, it's still giving me problems, but if you say it works for you there must be something I'm missing, I shall play around with it more.
In terms of understanding the code a bit better too, I have some more questions if you have a moment.
idx = find( x(n,:) == 1, 1 )
In that line of the code, what is the very last 1 doing? The one after the comma.
out = cumsum(a==1,2)==1 & a==1;
For this line of code, I don't understand where it specifies to work with each row independently?
Thanks
Chameleon17
Chameleon17 le 1 Juin 2015
I was in logical instead of double... it works now! :) Thank you!
Adam
Adam le 1 Juin 2015
Modifié(e) : Adam le 1 Juin 2015
The final 1 after the comma is the 2nd argument to the find function which tells it to just find the first occurrence rather than all occurrences (or some other number than 1 if explicitly defined).
If you don't add that argument you will get all indices on the row corresponding to ones.
For example:
a = [0 0 1 1 0 0 1]
a =
0 0 1 1 0 0 1
>> find( a == 1 )
ans =
3 4 7
>> find( a == 1, 1 )
ans =
3
When I have something like this I don't fully understand I find it invaluable to just create a quick example on the command line so I can see for myself what is going on. It is one of the big advantages of Matalb over, for example, C++ where you need to do a lot more work to just test to see what simple syntax alternatives give you.
Chameleon17
Chameleon17 le 2 Juin 2015
Yes, I think that is really good advice, to trial it on smaller data sets, I've already reduced my data set loads to learn how to do this, but yes, nothing is going to replace understanding all the basics properly.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Loops and Conditional Statements dans Centre d'aide et File Exchange

Tags

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by