Improving performance of interp1 function inside for loop

3 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Arya
Arya le 23 Août 2016
Modifié(e) : Arya le 24 Août 2016
Hello,
I'm looking for some insight on troubleshooting a matlab fcn bottleneck in a Simulink project. According to the code profiler this Matlab in-line function is (understandably) hogging the runtime:
function [preview,preview_a] = fcn(dp,X_matrix,rho_matrix)
%preallocate
rho_matrix_t = rho_matrix'
preview_a=zeros(1,185);
for i=1:dp
preview(i)=X+i;
preview_a(i)=interp1(X_matrix,rho_matrix_t,preview(i));
end
I understand the interp1 will inevitably consume some CPU time, but could there be some approach to improve the above code?
In the meantime I have these following in mind:
  1. Vectorization: building preview(1:dp) then do interp1 operation in batch (but I suspect interp1 doesn't support this)
  2. Using other built-in Simulink block that does equivalent jobs? (I've been looking at interp block, will see if it does the job).
Any suggestions are welcomed. :)
Regards,
Arya

Réponse acceptée

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson le 23 Août 2016
interp1() is fine with accepting a vector of points to interpolate at. Building preview ahead of time should work well.
  1 commentaire
Arya
Arya le 24 Août 2016
Modifié(e) : Arya le 24 Août 2016
Indeed, it turns out interp1() is happy to accept vector points, this is what I did:
function [preview,preview_a] = fcn(dp,X_matrix,rho_matrix)
%preallocate
rho_matrix_t = rho_matrix'
preview_a=zeros(1,185);
i=1:dp
preview(i) = X+i
preview_a(i)=interp1(X_matrix,rho_matrix_t,preview(i));
Much simpler than I thought, and seem to accelerate the execution time a bit.
Cheers!

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Plus de réponses (0)

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Simulink dans Help Center et File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by