How to efficiently generate a new array by indexing an array with another array

1 vue (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Is there a faster way to implement this loop, maybe vectorizing it?
for j = 1:m
C(:,j) = B(A(:,j,k),j);
end
where:
A is a l x m x n 3-D array of int from 1 to 4
B is a p x m 2-D array of doubles
C is a l x m 2-D array of doubles
l = order of 1000 ; m = order of 10 ; n = order of 100 ; p = 4
  2 commentaires
Paolo Binetti
Paolo Binetti le 3 Jan 2017
Sorry, I forgot: k is an index from 2 to n Indeed, the piece of code above is inside a "k" for-loop

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Réponse acceptée

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson le 3 Jan 2017
L = l; %make it easier to distinguish lower-case L
C = B(sub2ind(size(B), A(:,:,k), repmat( 1:m, L, 1) ));
  2 commentaires
Paolo Binetti
Paolo Binetti le 3 Jan 2017
Modifié(e) : Paolo Binetti le 3 Jan 2017
Thank you: your solution is about 5-10 faster, which is good enough for me, as long as I compute
repmat( 1:m, L, 1)
only once and not inside the k-for-loop that contains this piece of code.
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson le 4 Jan 2017
Yes, that is a good idea, to move that computation outside the loop.
If you have R2016b or later it can be improved even more:
C = B( (A(:,:,k) - 1) * p + (1:m) )
and the 1:m could be assigned to a variable before the loop

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Plus de réponses (0)

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Matrix Indexing dans Help Center et File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by