What makes the difference between griddata and griddatan?
3 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
Since griddatan is the n-d generalization of griddata, I assume that for 2-d scenarios, they should have identical behavior. This is true for most cases. For example:
uv = [-6,-13;-3,-9;-9,-2;-12,7;25,-14;16,-24;3,15];
xy = [8,6;15,1;4,-11;-3,9];
z1 = griddata(uv(:,1),uv(:,2),uv(:,2),xy(:,1),xy(:,2))
z2 = griddatan(uv,uv(:,2),xy)
The output is:
z1 =
6.0000
NaN
-11.0000
9.0000
z2 =
6.0000
NaN
-11.0000
9.0000
But in the following example, griddata gives valid output while griddatan fails.
uv = [0,0;0,2;2,2;2,0];
xy = [1,1;3,1];
z1 = griddata(uv(:,1),uv(:,2),uv(:,2),xy(:,1),xy(:,2))
z2 = griddatan(uv,uv(:,2),xy)
The error message indicates that some internal check of the convex hull in griddatan fails. But why is that? Why griddata run without a similar convex check? Thanks.
1 commentaire
Honglei Chen
le 3 Fév 2017
I'd suggest you report this to MathWorks. Regardless of the reason, you certainly should get a better error message.
Réponses (0)
Voir également
Catégories
En savoir plus sur Interpolation dans Help Center et File Exchange
Produits
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!