Using "find" for finding decimal values

54 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
MiauMiau
MiauMiau le 13 Déc 2012
Hi
I use the matlab command importdata:
X = importdata('filename.csv');
to read in a csv file with three columns.
Now, for finding a specific values in the matrix X, I simple use the find command as follows:
idx = find(X(:,1 ) == 17)
But, the same seems not to be possible for decimal numbers. This for instance would not work:
idx = find(X(:,1 ) == 17.9203)
even though 17.9203 is to be found in the original csv file. What is the problem and what can I do?
Thanks

Réponse acceptée

Matt Fig
Matt Fig le 13 Déc 2012
Modifié(e) : Matt Fig le 13 Déc 2012
MiauMiau, the numbers you are looking for are obviously different from the short format you see. Do this:
[~,idx] = min(abs(X(:,1) - 6.0018));
Y = X(idx,1);
[~,idx] = min(abs(X(:,1) - 17.9203));
fprintf('%15.15f %15.15f\n',Y,X(idx,1))
And show us the ouput in a comment on this answer, don't add another answer!
I have a feeling you will need to set your tolerance much higher, like 10^-4.
  4 commentaires
MiauMiau
MiauMiau le 13 Déc 2012
Thanks - it works perfectly, wow! I thought there is a number like 17.9203 because I used two input files which were supposed to be identical - obviously there were not. May I ask how you found out the tolerance has to be set to 10^-3? I don't understand that yet. Thank you very much!
Matt Fig
Matt Fig le 14 Déc 2012
I found out by looking at how close your guess value was to the actual value. You may have to do some tweaking but you get the idea now.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Plus de réponses (4)

Azzi Abdelmalek
Azzi Abdelmalek le 13 Déc 2012
Try
idx = find(abs(X(:,1 )-17.9203)<eps)
  2 commentaires
Jan
Jan le 13 Déc 2012
Modifié(e) : Jan le 13 Déc 2012
Substracting two numbers in the magnitude of 20 can have a roundoff error of eps(20). Then this is better:
idx = find(abs(X(:,1 ) - 17.9203) <= eps(17.9203)) % EDITED: was "<"
Even 10*eps(17.9203) would be a reliable limit.
[EDITED] Thanks, Kye. I cannot test this currently. But I assume that even "<=" can fail, when the values are at the limits of 2^n. Does eps(16 + eps(16)) reply eps(32)? Then a factor of 2 would be obligatory.
Kye Taylor
Kye Taylor le 13 Déc 2012
should be <=

Connectez-vous pour commenter.


Jan
Jan le 13 Déc 2012
Modifié(e) : Jan le 13 Déc 2012
There is no exact representation of decimal floating point numbers in binary format for all values. You find a lot of corresponding discussion in this forum:
0.1 + 0.2 - 0.3 == 0
>> false
This is no bug, but the expected behaviour, when floating point numbers are represented with a limited precision.
A consequence is, that you cannot compare numbers like 17.9203 and 17.92029999999999999999 sufficiently and even the display in the command window can be rather confusing.

MiauMiau
MiauMiau le 13 Déc 2012
I was not aware of that, that is pretty horrible! Anyway, both of your suggestions did not work, so also for:
idx = find(abs(X(:,1 ) - 17.9203) < eps(17.9203))
I did get an empty matrix returned - although the value is to be found in X. Also, when I changed the number a bit, I then got too many answers returned. But what strikes me most, is that in the first case, I just did not get any answer at all!..?!
  7 commentaires
Azzi Abdelmalek
Azzi Abdelmalek le 13 Déc 2012
Yes, I said Matlab because we are working with Matlab. I think, representing real numbers for numerical programming is almost similar to what an ADC (analogic-digital converter) do. There is a quantification of a real number, which means there is an error of quantification which depends on the number of used bits and method.
Jan
Jan le 13 Déc 2012
@Azzi: I've stressed this detail, because the OP seems to be confused about this topic already. I did not assume, that you struggle with floating point arithmetics.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.


MiauMiau
MiauMiau le 13 Déc 2012
I am really sorry for my use of the word "horrible".
If you meant the following command though ( I have used another nummerical value):
idx = find(abs(X(:,1 ) - 6.0018) <= eps(6.0018))
I - again - got an empty 0,1-matrix.
Also, I was not criticising the obviously necessary restriction on measurement and computation precision but I was amazed that there is not a simpler command to handle that. Anyway. What shall I try next?
  1 commentaire
Jan
Jan le 13 Déc 2012
Why do you assume that 6.0018 is an element of X?

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Logical dans Help Center et File Exchange

Tags

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by