Effacer les filtres
Effacer les filtres

How to convert the for loop to a while loop?

2 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Avinash Gupta
Avinash Gupta le 30 Mar 2021
Modifié(e) : MG le 1 Avr 2021
A = [7 3 2 1; 2 9 4 5; 1 3 13 4; 4 5 8 14 ]; % A is diagonally dominant
b = [1;2;3;4];
x = zeros(4,1);
x_new = zeros(4,1);
% Gauss Seidel using for loop
n = 4;
for iter = 1:25
for i = 1:n
num = b(i)-A(i,1:i-1)*x_new(1:i-1) - A(i,i+1:n)*x(i+1:n);
x_new(i) = num/A(i,i);
x = x_new;
end
disp(['At iteration = ',num2str(iter), ' x = ', num2str(x_new')]);
end
% The for loop works but the while loop doesn't
%% This is what I have done in the while loop.
% Gauss seidel using while loop
n = 4;
error = 0;
iter = 0;
while error >=1e-6
for i = 1:n
x_new(i) = (b(i)-A(i,1:i-1)*x_new(1:i-1)- A(i,i+1:n)*x(i+1:n))/A(i,i);
x = x_new;
error = abs(x-x_new);
end
iter = iter+1;
disp(['At iteration = ',num2str(iter), ' x = ', num2str(x_new')]);
end

Réponse acceptée

MG
MG le 30 Mar 2021
Modifié(e) : MG le 30 Mar 2021
Hi Avinash,
I modified your code into something I believe is what you might want:
A = [7 3 2 1; 2 9 4 5; 1 3 13 4; 4 5 8 14 ]; % A is diagonally dominant
b = [1;2;3;4];
x = zeros(4,1);
x_new = zeros(4,1); %<---- modified
% Gauss seidel using while loop
n = 4;
error = ones(4,1); %<---- modified
iter = 0;
while prod( error >= 1e-6*ones(4,1) ) %<---- modified
for i = 1:n
x_new(i) = (b(i)-A(i,1:i-1)*x_new(1:i-1)- A(i,i+1:n)*x(i+1:n))/A(i,i);
error(i) = abs(x(i)-x_new(i)); %<---- modified
x(i) = x_new(i); %<---- modified to be after error
end
iter = iter+1;
disp(['At iteration = ',num2str(iter), ' x = ', num2str(x_new')]);
end
I then just notice that you have in your code this code sequence
A(i,1:i-1)*x_new(1:i-1)
and I don't know if that does what you expect, beceuse with i =1 then A(1,1:0) *x_new(1:0) is a multiplication of two empty matrices (that probably returns 0).
  3 commentaires
Avinash Gupta
Avinash Gupta le 31 Mar 2021
Hi, Michael. Thanks for the prompt response.
1. However, I do not understand this modification: while prod( error >= 1e-6*ones(4,1) )
Why can't we go with: while error >= 1e-5*? Kindly explain the difference
2. A(i,1:i-1)*x_new(1:i-1)-----> This is not so useful for x_new(1) and getting an empty matrix is fine at that step.It is redundant for x_new(1). However, it becomes useful for other x_new(i), i= 2,3,4
3. Also the error should be calculated before the update. Thanks for pointing it out
Ps: I am quite new to MATLAB and I am still navigating my way around
MG
MG le 31 Mar 2021
Modifié(e) : MG le 1 Avr 2021
  1. You can use your original 'error >= 1e-6', it should do the same thing. I only did it to more explicitely show that it checks individually each of the elements in your 4 component 'error' array. If any is false, the loop stops. Replace 'prod' with 'any' if you instead want that every error(i) < 1e-6 before the while-loop ends.
  2. Fine, as long as it does what you intend (in practice that is a a multiplication of two empty arrows that here return 0, but I'm not really sure why it returns 0 and not an empty matrix).

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Plus de réponses (0)

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Loops and Conditional Statements dans Help Center et File Exchange

Tags

Produits


Version

R2021a

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by