Why linsolve cannot solve this very simple equation?

5 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Mr M.
Mr M. le 19 Avr 2021
A = [4,2,2; 5,1,3; 6,0,4];
B = [60; 70; 80];
X = linsolve(A,B)
The solution should be 6, 7, 11, since:
4x6 + 2x7 + 2x11 = 60
5x6 + 1x7 + 3x11 = 70
6x6 + 0x7 + 4x11 = 80
But I get the following answer:
Warning: Matrix is close to singular or badly scaled. Results may be inaccurate. RCOND =
7.401487e-18.
X = [0; 10; 20]
Why?

Réponse acceptée

Stephan
Stephan le 19 Avr 2021
Modifié(e) : Stephan le 19 Avr 2021
To solve this, the rank should be 3. Row 1 and 3 are not linear independent.
A = [4,2,2; 5,1,3; 6,0,4]
B = [60; 70; 80];
r1 = rank(A)
r2 = rank([A, B])
linsolve gives a correct solution, because there are more then 1 solutions, due to the rank:
>> X = linsolve(A,B)
Test = A*X
Warning: Matrix is close to singular or badly scaled. Results may be inaccurate. RCOND =
7.401487e-18.
X =
0
10
20
Test =
60
70
80

Plus de réponses (1)

Steven Lord
Steven Lord le 19 Avr 2021
The vector [6; 7; 11] is a solution to the problem but it is not the only solution.
A = [4,2,2; 5,1,3; 6,0,4];
B = [60; 70; 80];
sol1 = [6; 7; 11];
check = A*sol1-B; % should be close to 0
[sol1, check]
ans = 3×2
6 0 7 0 11 0
N = null(A); % A*N is close to the 0 vector
sol2 = sol1 + N; % Since A*sol1 = B and A*N = 0, A*(sol1+N) = B+0 = B
check2 = A*sol2-B; % should also be close to 0
[sol2, check2]
ans = 3×2
5.4655 0 7.2673 0 11.8018 0
sol3 = sol1 + 42*N; % A*(sol1+42*N) = A*sol1 + 42*A*N = B+0 = B
[sol3, A*sol3-B] % Also close to 0
ans = 3×2
-16.4499 -0.0000 18.2250 -0.0000 44.6749 0.0000

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Systems of Nonlinear Equations dans Help Center et File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by