Statistiques
RANG
189 281
of 301 313
RÉPUTATION
0
CONTRIBUTIONS
1 Question
4 Réponses
ACCEPTATION DE VOS RÉPONSES
0.0%
VOTES REÇUS
0
RANG
of 21 236
RÉPUTATION
N/A
CLASSEMENT MOYEN
0.00
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Fichier
TÉLÉCHARGEMENTS
0
ALL TIME TÉLÉCHARGEMENTS
0
RANG
of 173 955
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Problèmes
0 Solutions
SCORE
0
NOMBRE DE BADGES
0
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Publications
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Public Chaîne
CLASSEMENT MOYEN
CONTRIBUTIONS
0 Point fort
NOMBRE MOYEN DE LIKES
Feeds
Bug in BLE performance simulation
One other way for us to try to converge on this is for me to ask this: where did you come up with the formula snrVec = EbNo ...
plus de 5 ans il y a | 0
Bug in BLE performance simulation
What does "E" refer to in your formula? I think we're in agreement on what Eb/No means - it's a commonly used term in digital ...
plus de 5 ans il y a | 0
Bug in BLE performance simulation
I'm OK with the way you're handling sps (samples per symbol) in your simulation. You're using it to lower the SNR by 10*log(sps)...
plus de 5 ans il y a | 0
Bug in BLE performance simulation
Hi Deepak - The correct formula mapping Eb/N0 to SNR doesn't depend on the code rate per se. It depends on the ratio R of the ...
plus de 5 ans il y a | 0
Question
Bug in BLE performance simulation
I think there could be a bug in and around these two lines of this Matlab sim. codeRate = 1/2; snrVec = EbNo + 10...
plus de 5 ans il y a | 6 réponses | 0
