O, I get it, A is an object, and setField like something you apply to this object. I'm not familiar with object oriented programming. Any change I might get this to work though?
Accessing various field names deep in a structure.
22 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
babi psylon
le 12 Nov 2013
Modifié(e) : Cristian Constantinescu
le 25 Fév 2019
hi
Image I want to access fieldnames one, two, three, four in structure A.B.C.D.E.F and so on, with each possible letter containing fieldnames one, two, three four, e.g. A.B.C.one, A.B.C.two. In one iteration, I might wanna get A.B.C.one, but in the next A.B.C.D.one. I could of course make switch cases like: case condition, then go to A.B.C.D.one, case ..., but I would like to parse to common part of the fieldnames, e.g. 'B.C.D.E' to A. like this: A.('B.C.D.E').one. As such, ('B.C.D.E') could be easily replaced by e.g. ('B.C.') and my code would be less redundant. In a post by Loren, I found the answer below to solve my problem, posted by Brad Stiritz. However, I don't get this to work, when I try
A.B.C.D = 50; ans = A.getField('A.B.C.D')
I get
Reference to non-existent field 'getField'.
I tried ans = getField(A,'B.C.D') and ans = getField(A,'A.B.C.D'), but also got errors. Anyone who has a similar solution or can get this to work?
Thx!
I cite: " I wrote a class ‘FieldInterface’ to encapsulate arbitrary-depth struct fields, just as you’re talking about, so I can do things like:
————————————–
A.setField(‘A.B.C.D’,20); ans = A.getField(‘A.B.C.D’);
————————————–
The code snip below is the essence of method getField(). Note the reference to classdef constant ROOT_FIELD_NAME, which anchors the “dynamic” Fields.
————————————–
function outValue = getField(obj,varargin) … fieldSpecStr = varargin{1}; … try
% Construct near-complete field name (only lacking ‘obj.’), e.g. % ‘ROOT_FIELD_NAME.subStructName.fieldName’ fullFieldStr = [ obj.ROOT_FIELD_NAME '.' fieldSpecStr ];
% Get cell vector of sub-struct / field names within (fullFieldStr) cvFieldSplits = regexp(fullFieldStr,’\.’,'split’);
% Initialize (outValue): outValue = obj;
% Iterate through (cvFieldSplits) for iSplit = 1 : numel(cvFieldSplits)
% Access next-level within (cvFieldSplits), which will either be a % further sub-struct or else the final, desired field: outValue = outValue.(cvFieldSplits{iSplit}); end
% Handle failure catch exception … end
————————————–
Hope s/o finds this useful. Any comments appreciated,
3 commentaires
Matt J
le 12 Nov 2013
Modifié(e) : Matt J
le 12 Nov 2013
It just seems like a bad idea to nest structs so deep. Most of the indexing you describe is basically what struct arrays were designed for. So, rather than having
one.two.three.two.one.F
you would instead make F a struct array and do F(1,2,3,2,1).
Réponse acceptée
Plus de réponses (1)
Paul Jordan
le 14 Nov 2018
A.B.C.D = 50;
s = {'B','C','D'};
getfield(A,s{:})
ans =
50
1 commentaire
Cristian Constantinescu
le 25 Fév 2019
Modifié(e) : Cristian Constantinescu
le 25 Fév 2019
This is such a concise and elegant solution to something I've been searching for a while.
Thank you!
Voir également
Catégories
En savoir plus sur Structures dans Help Center et File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!