Why is this simple parallel program much slower than the non-parallel version?
2 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
Andy Yancy
le 4 Fév 2014
Commenté : Andy Yancy
le 6 Fév 2014
I have a very simple script that calls the built-in genetic algorithm function:
function test1(gen)
options = gaoptimset('UseParallel', 'always', 'Vectorized', 'off');
tic;
x = ga(@dejong5fcn, 2, [], [], [], [], [], [], [], options);
toc
end
First, I ran test1 without starting matlabpool. As expected, it runs fine but uses only one CPU core as observed with Windows Resource Monitor. It takes 4.2 seconds to run 20020 fitness evaluations. Then, I started the parallel engine with: "start matlabpool local 4" and then performed an otherwise identical run of test1. It runs and uses all four CPU cores, but takes about 90.7 seconds to perform 20020 fitness evaluations.
What am I not understanding about parallelism in Matlab R2012a (on Windows 7 64 bit)? Thanks for any help.
0 commentaires
Réponse acceptée
Walter Roberson
le 4 Fév 2014
4 commentaires
Walter Roberson
le 6 Fév 2014
Pr-allocation. When you use parfor(), MATLAB automatically pre-allocates for the outputs. If you have not pre-allocated in your code, the serial version could spend most of its time finding new memory and copying the results into it.
Plus de réponses (0)
Voir également
Catégories
En savoir plus sur Genetic Algorithm dans Help Center et File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!