I need a starting point for choosing "spread" when using newrb()

1 vue (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Shadan
Shadan le 24 Avr 2014
Commenté : Shadan le 29 Avr 2014
My data sets consist of 62 inputs and one output and I want to do function approximation. I understand that the optimum "spread" value is usually determined by trial and error. However, I was wondering if there is any way of approximating this value ( just to get a sense of its greatness )? My second question is regarding the minimum number of training samples required when using newrb. Is it just like the feedforward neural networks, the more the better?
Thank you for your support

Réponse acceptée

Greg Heath
Greg Heath le 28 Avr 2014
Modifié(e) : Greg Heath le 28 Avr 2014
If you standardize inputs (zscore or mapstd) the unity default is a good starting place.
The best generalization performance comes from using as few hidden neurons as possible.
Search the neural net literature (e.g., comp.ai.neural-nets FAQ) using the terms
overfitting
overtraining

Plus de réponses (0)

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Deep Learning Toolbox dans Help Center et File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by