Finding parfor baffling: Can anybody explain to me why this little bit of code works with for,but not with parfor?
1 vue (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
John Billingham
le 3 Sep 2014
Commenté : John Billingham
le 4 Sep 2014
function B = partest
A = 1:4; B = zeros(1,4);
parfor j=1:2
B([j j+2]) = A([j+2 j]);
end
The two bits of the loop access different bits of B, so there should be some way of doing this. My actual application involves large cell arrays, for which something similar holds for the function within the loop.
0 commentaires
Réponse acceptée
Plus de réponses (1)
José-Luis
le 3 Sep 2014
Modifié(e) : José-Luis
le 3 Sep 2014
Looks like the interpreter is not smart enough to detect that there is no race condition in the case you present. You could go around that using two loops:
A = 1:4; B = zeros(1,4);
parfor j=1:2
B(j) = A(j+2);
end
parfor j=1:2
B(j+2) = A(j);
end
I assume the operations you actually perform are more complicated than that. Otherwise Matt J's solution is the way to go.
Voir également
Catégories
En savoir plus sur Matrix Indexing dans Help Center et File Exchange
Produits
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!