Constructing an Offset-Curve

Probably this question has already been posted several times, however I was not able to find an answer.

I have a smooth curve given as a set of X and Y data points and I am trying to constrcut an offset curve. Bascially my strategie was to search for the perpendicular direction at each point of the given [X,Y] data set and then follow this direction according to the desired offset. This works well for convex curves. However for concave curves, there will be a setback at certain points.

This is actually a very common problem in CNC programming. Commercial CAD and CAM software packages mostly offer a solution to this problem. Unfortunately I was not able to find a solution in matlab. Maybe I am looking in the wrong place...

I would be glad if someone could share their knowledge.

Thanks in advance! Ben

[Will Walton]

Ben, I was wondering what kind of progress you've made on this. I'm working on a similar issue, trying to compare the profile of a machined part using a CMM with a nominal profile. The algorithms in Mohammad's paper make sense in an abstract way, but actually implementing them in Matlab seems difficult.

[Andries Paula]

Hey. Did you managed to find out what approche is the best ?

Answer 1

[Unai San Miguel]

The subject is not trivial, a nice description can be found in the Patrikalakis et al. ebook, Offset curves and surfaces. They also speak about the particular problems of CNC.

[Ben]

I agree, it is not a trivial task! Thank you for your input, this looks very informative.

Answer 2

[alper yeldan]

It is an old question but I think I can explain a bit more. You shoul check this. If you know the equation of your function can express in x = [x(t), y(t)]. Parallel curve with a distance d can be expressed in Cartesian coordinates as:

x_d(t) = x(t) + d*dy(t) / sqrt(dx(t)^2 + dy(t)^2);

y_d(t) = y(t) - d*dx(t)/sqrt(dx(t)^2 + dy(t)^2);

From here you can easily plot the parallel curves in MATLAB, but it might not be possible in CAD programs, because these lines are generally NOT polynomial. If you want to see more examples check this link too.

Answer 3

[Matt J]

You haven't said what properties your "offset curve" must satisfy, so this is just a shot in the dark. However, what you could do is create a binary image that is white in the region above or below the given curve. Then apply imerode(). Then, find the boundary of the eroded region using bwboundaries. Then, do a curve fit to the boundary points and call that your final offset curve.

[Ben]

Ok, let me specify:

In industrial applications these offset curves are used for tool corrections. Most important, the curve needs to be parallel to the basic curve. The image below should give enough information.

Red line: basic curve, Blue line: Offset curve

[Matt J]

The image below should give enough information.

Nope. Why not just subtract any arbitrary constant value from the basic curve? The result will assuredly be parallel to it.

[Ben]

Parallelism is the most important constrain, but not the only one. As the example in the image above shows, the basic curve and the offset curve are not identical curves that simply have a different position.

[Mohammad Abouali]

Matt, a simple translation of all points doesn't work. It is more complicated than just a simple translation of points.

And the goal is not just to keep the red and blue line parallel to each other. But also a t a certain distance from each other. So, depending on the curves and the distance they gradually actually reshape and change their form.

This is very common in CAD softwares. AutoCAD had it as long as I remember.

[Matt J]

Guys, you're missing my point. Of course I know there must be more constraints. My point is that the discussion can't go forward without us being told what they are!!