Unit Step Funtion Without using heaviside function
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
How can I plot the u(t) = u(t-1)+u(t-2)+u(t-3)+u(t-4)-u(t+1)-u(t+2)-u(t+3)-u(t+4) ?
I would like to have the plot going up on both sides without using the heaviside func.
Thank you!
4 commentaires
Sam Chak
le 21 Juin 2022
Is there a particular reason you want to avoid Heaviside?
Ashley Kim
le 21 Juin 2022
I see. Thanks for your clarification. The general idea is to create a function that produce the same output like the Heaviside function. For example, let's create a SAM function (square and minus) 😄
sam = @(x) x.^2 - x;
A = sam(5)
Walter Roberson
le 21 Juin 2022
hint: something >= 0
Réponses (1)
you could go over the integration of the delta function, which is the heaviside function:
t=-5:5;
ds=[0 1 1 1 1 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 0];
s=cumsum(ds);
stairs(t,s)
edit: ok, i think ds needs to be multiplied with -1:
ds=[0 -1 -1 -1 -1 0 1 1 1 1 0];
2 commentaires
Yup, can't find any difference between them.
% Code directly using Heaviside function
t = linspace(-5, 5, 10001);
u = heaviside(t - 1) + heaviside(t - 2) + heaviside(t - 3) + heaviside(t - 4) - heaviside(t + 1) - heaviside(t + 2) - heaviside(t + 3) - heaviside(t + 4);
plot(t, u, 'linewidth', 1.5)
grid on
xlabel('t')
% Code indirectly depending on Heaviside function
A = gradient(u);
k = 1;
for j = 1:1000:10001
dS(k) = 2*A(j);
k = k + 1;
end
S = cumsum(dS); % integration of the delta function
T = -5:5;
stairs(T, S, 'r-', 'linewidth', 1.5)
grid on
xlabel('t')
Jonas
le 21 Juin 2022
there may be no visual difference but the difference lies in the detail. Heaviside is defined as 0.5 at 0 and the cumsum version is already 1 there.
Catégories
En savoir plus sur Signal Operations dans Centre d'aide et File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!

