Solving the Maximum and Minimum Problems of Multivariate Functions
1 vue (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
max y and min y
y=0.0435*x1-0.266*x2+4.2*x3+0.019*x1*x2-0.3 x1*x3-0.2485
10<x1<20, 0<x2<5, 30<x3<35
4 commentaires
Torsten
le 30 Mai 2023
Yes, it's true. And the second call to fmincon with -f instead of f is the call to maximize f.
fun = @(x)0.0435*x(1)-0.266*x(2)+4.2*x(3)+0.019*x(1)*x(2)-0.3*x(1)*x(3)-0.2485;
lb=[10;0;30];
ub=[20;5;35];
A = [];
b = [];
Aeq = [];
beq = [];
x0 = [10,0,30];
[x,fval] = fmincon(fun,x0,A,b,Aeq,beq,lb,ub);
xmin = x
fval_min = fval
[x,fval] = fmincon(@(x)-fun(x),x0,A,b,Aeq,beq,lb,ub);
xmax = x
fval_max = -fval
Réponses (1)
Walter Roberson
le 30 Mai 2023
Déplacé(e) : Walter Roberson
le 30 Mai 2023
No. You have coded finite lower bounds and upper bounds for x3, and you have coded a single region for x1. However your problem as stated has no bounds on x3, and gives two disconnected regions for x1.
fmincon and similar routines cannot handle two disconnected regions for a single variable. You will need to use ga with x1 defined over 10 to 35, and you will need to use nonlinear constraints to reject x1 that are not in either of the two regions.
7 commentaires
Voir également
Catégories
En savoir plus sur Solver Outputs and Iterative Display dans Help Center et File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!