- BRISQUE - Blind/Referenceless image spatial quality evaluator
- NIQE - Naturalness image quality evaluator
- PIQE - Perception-based image quality evaluator
How to evaluate the image generated with CycleGAN?
14 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
A network is trained using unsupervised data from both a 'good' image dataset and a 'noisy' image dataset with GAN. Subsequently, the trained network reconstructs the noisy image, resulting in a 'generated image' or 'denoised image'. At this point, we have both the 'noisy image' and the 'generated image,' with no 'real image' or 'target image' available.
Traditional image evaluation functions like "ssim(generated images, target image)" (and many other image evaluation functions) may not be suitable in this scenario for comparing the 'noisy image' and the 'generated image.' Also, metrics such as 'Frechet Inception Distance (FID)' and 'Inception Score (IS)' are commonly used to assess the distribution to evaluate the GAN model.
Given this context, what would be the most appropriate evaluation methods to measure the quality of images generated by the trained GAN network, with only the 'noisy-image' and the 'generated-image' (and the trained network)?
Your insights and wisdom on this matter are highly appreciated.
Thank you
0 commentaires
Réponse acceptée
Ayush Modi
le 22 Fév 2024
Hi John,
You can consider to assess the performance of the GAN model using "No Reference Image Quality" Metrics. Most commonly used "No Reference Image Quality Metrics" are:
Please refer to the following MathWorks documentation for more information on the "No Reference Image Quality" metrics:
Note - Each metric has different strengths depending on the images in the data set. To select the best metric for your data, you can compare the performance of the three metrics on sample image data.
0 commentaires
Plus de réponses (1)
Voir également
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!