Efficient Vectorization of For Loop

46 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Shreyas Bharadwaj
Shreyas Bharadwaj le 15 Avr 2024 à 21:08
Commenté : Shreyas Bharadwaj le 16 Avr 2024 à 14:44
Hi,
I have three matrices and C and am trying to compute a fourth matrix Min the following way:
for p = 1:N
for q = 1:N
M(p,q) = 2 * sum(A(:,q) .* conj(B(:,p)) .* C(:,q));
end
end
All matrices are . I am trying to compute this for N = 750 or so and the computation is extremely slow. I cannot find any obvious way to vectorize the code. Any help would be very much appreciated.
Thanks.

Réponse acceptée

Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong le 15 Avr 2024 à 21:57
Modifié(e) : Bruno Luong le 15 Avr 2024 à 22:12
Not tested but the sign reading tell me
M = 2*B' * (A.*C);
  4 commentaires
James Tursa
James Tursa le 15 Avr 2024 à 22:31
Modifié(e) : James Tursa le 15 Avr 2024 à 22:33
I would guess that having 2*B' at the front will force MATLAB to physically compute the conjugate transpose of B first. However, if you segregate the 2* operation as 2 * (B' * (A.*C)), the B' would not need to be physically formed to do the conjugate transpose matrix multiply since this will be handled by flags passed into the BLAS routine. Maybe a bit faster? E.g.,
A = rand(5000); B = rand(5000); C = rand(5000);
timeit(@()2*B' * (A.*C))
ans = 0.5515
timeit(@()2*(B' * (A.*C)))
ans = 0.4901
Shreyas Bharadwaj
Shreyas Bharadwaj le 16 Avr 2024 à 14:44
Thank you!

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Plus de réponses (0)

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Loops and Conditional Statements dans Help Center et File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by