Going from trainNetwork to trainnet

6 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
psousa
psousa le 21 Nov 2024
Commenté : psousa le 28 Jan 2025
I've attached 3 files(see post below for latest version of these files):
  • trainNetworkEXAMPLE - my original trainNetwork implementation
  • trainnetEXAMPLE - the trainnet implementation
  • example.csv - data file with predictors and targets
The codes for the two examples are identical, the difference is only in the formatting of the input matrices.
trainNetworkEXAMPLE works as expected.
trainnetEXAMPLE works but convergence of the solver is different and solution is poor.
Both codes end with:
Training stopped: Met validation criterion
What am I getting wrong?
  2 commentaires
Matt J
Matt J le 21 Nov 2024
Seemingly nothing. Why do you think something is wrong?
psousa
psousa le 21 Nov 2024
NMSE for training set and test set are considerably worse for version using trainnet.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Réponse acceptée

Sourabh
Sourabh le 28 Jan 2025
Modifié(e) : Sourabh le 28 Jan 2025
I too encountered the similar issue when using “trainnet” and “trainNetwork” method.
The workaround that worked in my case was to:
  1. Use @mse as the loss function instead of "mse" in “trainnet”.
[net,info] = trainnet(XTrain,TTrain,layers,@mse,options);
2. Set 'GradientThreshold' to ‘Inf’ in ‘trainingOptions’ of both the programs.
options = trainingOptions('adam',
...
'GradientThreshold',Inf,
...
);
Kindly refer to the below image:
  1 commentaire
psousa
psousa le 28 Jan 2025
Matlab support got back to me within a couple weeks and that was the solution they offered.
Thanks for looking into it.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Plus de réponses (0)

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Deep Learning Toolbox dans Help Center et File Exchange

Produits


Version

R2024b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by