Numerical Methods for Singular systems

Could you please take a look at the code I wrote for the delayed singular system class and let me know if it's correct? Thank you all in advance!
%% Phase plane
clear all
clc
%% conditions
A_x=[0.5 0.7 -0.5;0.8 1.5 0.2; 0.9 0.8 0.3];
A_d=[1.6 0.58 0.4;0.96 1.7 0.8;0.5 0.8 0.45];
B=[1.4;0.5; 0.7];
stime=0;
endtime=600;
h=0.01;
t=-stime:h:endtime;
N_0=stime/h;
N_1=endtime/h;
N=N_0+N_1;
%bound=110;
for i=1:N+1
if i<=N_0+1;
x1(:,i)=0;
x2(:,i)=0;
x3(:,i)=0;
else
d_1=floor(1.5+sin(0.5*i*h));
if i<=3
x1(:,i)=x1(:,i-1)+h*(A_x(1,1)*x1(:,i-1)+A_x(1,2)*x2(:,i-1)+A_x(1,3)*x3(:,i-1)+B(1,1)*sin(0.5*i));
x2(:,i)=x2(:,i-1)+h*(A_x(2,1)*x1(:,i-1)+A_x(2,2)*x2(:,i-1)+A_x(2,3)*x3(:,i-1)+B(2,1)*sin(0.5*i));
x3(:,i)=-inv(A_x(3,3))*(A_x(3,1)*x1(:,i)+A_x(3,2)*x2(:,i)+B(3,1)*sin(0.5*i));
else
x1(:,i)=x1(:,i-1)+h*(A_x(1,1)*x1(:,i-1)+A_x(1,2)*x2(:,i-1)+A_x(1,3)*x3(:,i-1)+A_d(1,1)*x1(:,i-d_1-1)+A_d(1,2)*x2(:,i-d_1-1)+A_d(1,3)*x3(:,i-d_1-1)+B(1,1)*sin(0.5*i));
x2(:,i)=x2(:,i-1)+h*(A_x(2,1)*x1(:,i-1)+A_x(2,2)*x2(:,i-1)+A_x(2,3)*x3(:,i-1)+A_d(2,1)*x1(:,i-d_1-1)+A_d(2,2)*x2(:,i-d_1-1)+A_d(2,3)*x3(:,i-d_1-1)+B(2,1)*sin(0.5*i));
x3(:,i)=-inv(A_x(3,3))*(A_x(3,1)*x1(:,i)+A_x(3,2)*x2(:,i)+A_d(3,1)*x1(:,i-d_1)+A_d(3,2)*x2(:,i-d_1)+A_d(3,3)*x3(:,i-d_1)+B(3,1)*sin(0.5*i));
end
end
end
%% Plotting Graphs
figure(1)
% grid on
% hold on
% box on
plot(t,x1(1,:),'b-','linewidth',1)
hold on
plot(t,x2(1,:),'r:','linewidth',2)
plot(t,x3(1,:),'r:','linewidth',2)
xlabel('Time (t)')
%ylabel('Responses x(t)')
legend('x_{1}(t)','x_{2}(t)');
% xlim([0,1000]);
% %ylim([-0.2,0.8]);
%

 Réponse acceptée

Torsten
Torsten le 21 Avr 2025
Modifié(e) : Torsten le 21 Avr 2025
The loop index i does not equal time t. So expressions like
d_1=floor(1.5+sin(0.5*i*h));
x1(:,i-d_1-1)
x2(:,i-d_1-1)
x3(:,i-d_1-1)
sin(0.5*i)
in your code are clearly wrong.
Up to t ~ 2.43, the delay part is zero, and the results should be the same as with the code below. It can serve as validation code for your results after you've made the necessary corrections.
M = [1 0 0;0 1 0;0 0 0];
A = [0.5 0.7 -0.5;0.8 1.5 0.2; 0.9 0.8 0.3];
B = [1.4;0.5; 0.7];
tstart = 0;
tend = 2.43;
tspan = [tstart,tend];
f = @(t,y)A*y+B*sin(0.5*t);
y0 = [0;0;0];
options = odeset('Mass',M);
[T,Y] = ode15s(f,tspan,y0,options);
plot(T,Y)
grid on

7 commentaires

I did not use the original code provided by the OP. Instead, I am writing from scratch. But I am unsure if the following approach is the correct method for solving delay differential algebraic equations in MATLAB. Could you please review it?
For differential-algebraic equations (DAEs), we typically use the ode15s or ode23t solvers, and for delay differential equations (DDEs), we commonly utilize either the dde23 or ddesd solvers. However, for a combination of both types, I am uncertain which solver to choose.
tspan = [0 5];
M = [1 0 0 % singular mass matrix
0 1 0
0 0 0];
options = odeset('Mass', M);
sol = ddesd(@ddefun, @delx, @history, tspan, options);
%% plot results
plot(sol.x, sol.y, '-o'), grid on
legend('x_1', 'x_2', 'x_3', 'location', 'northwest')
title('Solution for delay differential algebraic system')
xlabel('Time t')
ylabel('Solution x')
%% delay function
function d = delx(t, x)
d = t - 1.5 - sin(0.5*t);
end
%% delay differential equations
function dydt = ddefun(t,x,Z)
A = [0.5, 0.7, -0.5
0.8, 1.5, 0.2
0.9, 0.8, 0.3];
Ad = [1.60, 0.58, 0.40
0.96, 1.70, 0.80
0.50, 0.80, 0.45];
B = [1.4
0.5
0.7];
dydt = A*x + Ad*Z + B*sin(0.5*t);
end
%% solution history
function s = history(t)
s = zeros(3, 1);
end
Torsten
Torsten le 21 Avr 2025
Modifié(e) : Torsten le 21 Avr 2025
Your code would be correct of "ddesd" worked for differential-algebraic delay differential equations. But it only works for differential delay equations as far as I know. Thus the "0" in front of x3dot is the problem.
ddeset
AbsTol: [ positive scalar or vector {1e-6} ] Events: [ function_handle ] InitialStep: [ positive scalar ] InitialY: [ vector ] Jumps: [ vector ] MaxStep: [ positive scalar ] NormControl: [ on | {off} ] OutputFcn: [ function_handle ] OutputSel: [ vector of integers ] Refine: [ positive integer {1} ] RelTol: [ positive scalar {1e-3} ] Stats: [ on | {off} ]
Le
Le le 24 Avr 2025
Ok, Thank you very much @Torsten
Could you find the solution for the system without the delay terms (thus up to 2.4389) (e.g. using the implicit Euler method) ?
f = @(x) x-1.5-sin(0.5*x);
fzero(f,2)
ans = 2.4389
Le
Le le 24 Avr 2025
Could you please help me correct the code above @Torsten? Thank you very much."
Torsten
Torsten le 24 Avr 2025
You post your questions about code for delay differential equations for almost one year now, but it seems you don't make any progress (at least in the programming part). It's not possible to give solutions to obvious homework problems, but you should enhance your programming skills: try MATLAB Onramp - an introduction to MATLAB free of costs to learn the basics of the new language:
Le
Le le 25 Avr 2025
ok, thank you @Torsten so much!

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Plus de réponses (1)

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson le 21 Avr 2025
if i<=N_0+1;
x1(:,i)=0;
x2(:,i)=0;
x3(:,i)=0;
else
d_1=floor(1.5+sin(0.5*i*h));
if i<=3
This smells like you forgot the "end" for the first "if". In MATLAB, nesting is not determined by indentation.

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Mathematics dans Centre d'aide et File Exchange

Question posée :

Le
le 21 Avr 2025

Commenté :

Le
le 25 Avr 2025

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by