PMSM sensorless angle optimisation

12 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Jérémy
Jérémy le 12 Nov 2025
Réponse apportée : Satyam le 19 Nov 2025
Hello,
I am using the Motor control Blockset for simulating and programming a motor control board.
I have identified my motor's parameters with a LCR meter and double checked with a classic first order identification. (delta winding but Y assumption)
I use the block Flux Observer (https://fr.mathworks.com/help/mcb/ref/fluxobserver.html) for angle and speed estimation.
As a robustness test, I have changed the Ld and Rs parameters on the fly and find out I could reduce the Iq value for the same load by increasing the Ld parameter (up to x2). It works only during test and not simulation.
Does it means my angle estimation is necessary better with a x2 inductor value? What could cause this ?
Best regards,
Jérémy

Réponses (1)

Satyam
Satyam le 19 Nov 2025
Hi Jeremy,
Increasing Ld inside the Flux Observer can appear to improve torque‑per‑ampere (lower Iq​ for the same load) because it changes the internal decoupling and back‑EMF, shifting the estimated electrical angle closer to the true rotor position when your nominal parameters are biased. That effect shows up on hardware (with inverter non‑idealities, sensor offsets, temperature drift, magnetic saturation, delays, etc.) but not in an ideal simulation, so it’s more a parameter‑mismatch compensation than the true motor Ld​ being 2×. The right fix is to calibrate and/or adapt parameters and tune the observer/PLL for the real plant.

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Control Algorithm Design dans Help Center et File Exchange

Produits


Version

R2024b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by