Info

Cette question est clôturée. Rouvrir pour modifier ou répondre.

Can some solve this without for loops ?

1 vue (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Amelos
Amelos le 21 Juin 2016
Commenté : Amelos le 21 Juin 2016
a =rand(2,2,3); b = [ 1 2 3]; c = [1 2 3 4 5]; for n = 1: size(a,1) for m = 1:size(a,2) for s = 1: length(b) for k = 1: length(c) L(n,m,s,k)= a(n,m,s) +b(s)*a(n,m,s)*exp(c(k)*b(s)); end end end end
  2 commentaires
John D'Errico
John D'Errico le 21 Juin 2016
Modifié(e) : John D'Errico le 21 Juin 2016
Given that you got an answer the last time you asked this question, and you accepted that answer, then why repost it? It seems you are asking essentially the same question repeatedly.
Amelos
Amelos le 21 Juin 2016
I want to understand the approach. It is not the same. I changed the dimension of the matrix "a" (2->3). I solved in this way but I dont get the same answer: tmp = bsxfun(@times,reshape(b,1,1,[]),reshape(c,1,1,1,[])); tmp = bsxfun(@times,reshape(a,1,[]),exp(tmp)); tmp = bsxfun(@times,reshape(b,1,1,[]),tmp); tmp = bsxfun(@plus,reshape(a,1,[]),tmp);
Cheers

Réponses (0)

Cette question est clôturée.

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by