OSX and Mac Performance
4 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
I have two apple computers and thought it would be an interesting to compare performance (computer spec below)
COMPUTER A
- Model Name: Mac Pro
- Model Identifier: MacPro6,1
- Processor Name: 6-Core Intel Xeon E5
- Processor Speed: 3.5 GHz
- Number of Processors: 1
- Total Number of Cores:6
- L2 Cache (per Core): 256 KB
- L3 Cache: 12 MB
- Memory: 64 GB
COMPUTER B
- Model Name: MacBook Air
- Model Identifier: MacBookAir6,2
- Processor Name: Intel Core i7
- Processor Speed: 1.7 GHz
- Number of Processors: 1
- Total Number of Cores:2
- L2 Cache (per Core): 256 KB
- L3 Cache: 4 MB
- Memory: 8 GB
I use a simple fft() in a loop to test performance
function [ X ] = test( x )
a = 1:10000000;
for i = a
fft(x);
end
end
The performance is measured by timeit()
>> x = randn(8,1)
>> temp = @() test(x)
>> timeit(temp)
Computer A = 15.1 seconds Computer B = 11.1 seconds
The MacBook Air spanks the Mac Pro for performance
Why is this the case?
1 commentaire
Ken Atwell
le 18 Oct 2016
That is not much of an FFT. What if the vector is of a more realistic size, a say 1K or 2K?
Réponses (1)
Nelson Mark
le 22 Juin 2017
This is interesting and caught my eye because I'm thinking of buying a Mac Pro. Would you be willing to run some additional benchmarks on some different types of computations? e.g., generate 10000 X 5 random matrices, then doing least squares of column 1 on columns 2-5, 1000 times.
1 commentaire
John D'Errico
le 22 Juin 2017
This is not an answer. Please don't add answers just to make a comment, certainly not on a question that has seen no activity for nearly a year.
Voir également
Catégories
En savoir plus sur Logical dans Help Center et File Exchange
Produits
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!