Why Do I Get This Error for This Non-scalar Structure?
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
I have this struct:
A(1).B.C = 'a';
A(2).B.C = 'b';
A(3).B.C = 'a';
When I execute the code below, it works
A(:).B
However, when I execute the code below, it throws an error: “Expected one output from a curly brace or dot indexing expression, but there were 4 results.”
A(:).B.C
WHY do I get this error and MATLAB avoids executing this code?
1 commentaire
What do you expect the output to be? All of the field data concatenated together, or places into another container array (e.g. a cell array), or something else? So far you did not explain the desired output.
A(1).B.C = 'a';
A(2).B.C = 'b';
A(3).B.C = 'a';
tmp = [A.B];
{tmp.C} % cell array of fields
[tmp.C] % concatenate fields horizontally
cat(3,tmp.C) % concatenate fields along some other dimension
... etc. etc.
Réponse acceptée
Plus de réponses (3)
Because the operation ".C" is defined for structs and struct arrays, but not for a comma separated list. In A.C the opearion ".C" is applied to a struct array. In A(1).B.C it is applied to a struct. And in A(:).B.C it is tried to be applied to a comma separated list, but this is not defined.
You've struggeled a lot with nested structs. Although this might not be intuitive, Matlab does not have vectorized methods to process nested structs. This requires for loops and there is no way around - except for not using nested structs.
Of course it would be possible to implement this. I thought of doing this in a fast C-mex function, but then I stopped this due to ambiguities: What is the wanted result, when the nested struct contains struct arrays in different levels?
X =A(:).B.C(:).D(:).E
Or if C is a cell containing structs? How sould X look like? A general method must be able to catch this in an intuitive way, and this is not possible in my opinion. Therefore a function for accessing nested structs might look smart at first glance, but I'm convinced that it produces confusion and impedes the debugging. Therefore I stopped the development and decided to rely on stupid loops. Even if this might run some percent slower. Elegance of the the code does not rule, when it causes horrible debugging sessions.
Adam
le 13 Mar 2017
A(:).B
returns a comma-separated list of (in your example) 3 objects. You can't then further index these by adding .C at the end. Try just putting A(:).B on your command line and you will see why.
Mehmet Burak Ekinci
le 18 Août 2022
0 votes
If the problem is concatenating array elements of A struct's B.C field.
You could use this custom matlab functions from file exchange. It is for getting values and plotting for nested structure arrays.
For your example:
>>A(1).B.C = 'a';
A(2).B.C = 'b';
A(3).B.C = 'a';
>>getNestedField(A,'B.C')
ans =
3×1 char array
'a'
'b'
'a'
2 commentaires
The simple MATLAB equivalent without any third-party functions, using two comma-separated lists:
A(1).B.C = 'a';
A(2).B.C = 'b';
A(3).B.C = 'a';
tmp = [A.B];
out = vertcat(tmp.C)
Mehmet Burak Ekinci
le 22 Août 2022
Modifié(e) : Mehmet Burak Ekinci
le 22 Août 2022
Thank you for your response.
Out of curiosity i have compared run time of using comma seperated list method you mentioned, with the link i shared.
I would like to share that it is 4 times faster than the link.
For multiple level nested functions, using the comma seperated list method, something like that may be useful:
function structArray = fun(structArray, fieldName)
fieldNameTree = strsplit(fieldName, '.');
% recursively structArray become one level lower struct array, finally it
% will become the values at the desired field name,
% field values of the struct array are concatenated vertically
for i = 1:length(fieldNameTree)
structArray = [structArray.(fieldNameTree{i})]';
end
end
Catégories
En savoir plus sur Structures dans Centre d'aide et File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!