Code Optimization, for loop

1 vue (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Yusuke Kadowaki
Yusuke Kadowaki le 28 Sep 2017
Modifié(e) : Christoph F. le 29 Sep 2017
Is it possible to make this code faster?
%
RevPSD = zeros(size(X));
for m = Tmin + 1:size(X,2)
for i = Tmin:Tmax
if m - i <= 0
break
else
RevPSD(:,m) = RevPSD(:,m) + exp(-2*delta*i*hop/fs)*(Xpsd(:,m-i));
end
end
end
  2 commentaires
Christoph F.
Christoph F. le 28 Sep 2017
Two suggestions:
The inner loop only loops from Tmin to (m-1). The extra comparison of m and i inside the loop could be removed if the loop condition is changed, e.g.
for i = Tmin:(m-1)
RevPSD(:,m) = RevPSD(:,m) + exp(-2*delta*i*hop/fs)*(Xpsd(:,m-i));
end
The values of the term
exp(-2*delta*i*hop/fs)
only depend on i can could be pre-calculated for every possibly value of i outside the loop. e.g.
exptable = exp(-2*delta*(Tmin:Tmax)*hop/fs);
for m = Tmin + 1:size(X,2)
for i = Tmin:(m-1)
RevPSD(:,m) = RevPSD(:,m) + exptable(i-Tmin+1)*(Xpsd(:,m-i));
end
end
Jan
Jan le 28 Sep 2017
@Christoph F: Please post this in the answer sections.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Réponse acceptée

Christoph F.
Christoph F. le 28 Sep 2017
Two suggestions:
The inner loop only loops from Tmin to (m-1). The extra comparison of m and i inside the loop could be removed if the loop condition is changed, e.g.
for i = Tmin:(m-1)
RevPSD(:,m) = RevPSD(:,m) + exp(-2*delta*i*hop/fs)*(Xpsd(:,m-i));
end
The values of the term
exp(-2*delta*i*hop/fs)
only depend on i can could be pre-calculated for every possibly value of i outside the loop. e.g.
exptable = exp(-2*delta*(Tmin:Tmax)*hop/fs);
for m = Tmin + 1:size(X,2)
for i = Tmin:(m-1)
RevPSD(:,m) = RevPSD(:,m) + exptable(i-Tmin+1)*(Xpsd(:,m-i));
end
end
  2 commentaires
Yusuke Kadowaki
Yusuke Kadowaki le 29 Sep 2017
Thanks a lot Christoph. The second one worked a bit.
Christoph F.
Christoph F. le 29 Sep 2017
Modifié(e) : Christoph F. le 29 Sep 2017
Looking at the expression more closely, the whole term
exp(-2*delta*i*hop/fs)*(Xpsd(:,m-i))
only depends on m and i. I assume that with some creative thinking, the inner loop could be completely removed and replaced with adding a matrix to RevPSD.
The general idea is to use built-in MatLab matrix/vector functions (add, multiply, sum, etc) instead of loops whenever possible, and not to calculate expressions repeatedly that only need to be calculated once.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Plus de réponses (0)

Catégories

En savoir plus sur ループと条件付きステートメント dans Help Center et File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!