Problem computing inverse Laplace transform of the Bessel function

9 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Kevin B
Kevin B le 11 Nov 2017
Réponse apportée : BeeTiaw le 5 Août 2020
I am trying to evaluate the inverse Laplace transform of a function that includes the modified Bessel function of the second kind, i.e., my function is f_s = sqrt(a*s)*besselk(1,2*sqrt(a*s)), where a is a constant (say a = 0.5) and 's' is defined as a symbol. To evaluate the inverse Laplace transform of this function, I used the built-in Matlab function 'ilaplace' as transV = ilaplace(f_s,s,t), where I want to evaluate my function at 't' = 2. However, the problem I am getting is that the inverse transformed expression transV still contains 's' variable, which I supposed to transform to 't' after the inverse Laplace transform.
Can anyone help me with what is the problem with this approach? I checked the Matlab documentation and still couldn't figure out the solution. I already tried using 'vpa' function as it was suggested in one of the Matlab forums, but that didn't help to get rid of 's'. I am stuck with this and would really appreciate any help on it.
My code is
a = 0.5; t = 2;
syms s;
f_s = 1/s*sqrt(a*s)*besselk(1,2*sqrt(a*s));
transV = ilaplace(f_s,t); % or transV = vpa(ilaplace(f_s,t));
With this, the final result transV still has an expression which is a function of 's' although it should be transformed after ilaplace.
  2 commentaires
David Goodmanson
David Goodmanson le 11 Nov 2017
Hi Kevin,
It appears that the result is just a slightly different inverse laplace transform that the toolbox can't do either. Might not exist in closed form.
Kevin B
Kevin B le 11 Nov 2017
Hi David,
Thanks for your suggestion. Yes, the closed form solution seems not to exist. I tried Mathematica to check if it can help but without success. For me, the numerical solution is fine for now and I am not able to get that either. Do you have any further suggestions to get the numerical solution? Thanks a ton!

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Réponse acceptée

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson le 11 Nov 2017
Maple says that for a > 0, the result is (1/2)*exp(-a/t)
  3 commentaires
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson le 11 Nov 2017
Under the assumption that a1, a2, a3, a4, s are all > 0, then
(1/2)*(BesselK(1, 2*a2^(1/2)*a3^(1/2)/t)*exp((-a3-a2)/t)*a2^(1/2)*a3^(1/2)+BesselK(1, 2*a1^(1/2)*a4^(1/2)/t)*exp((-a4-a1)/t)*a4^(1/2)*a1^(1/2)+BesselK(1, 2*a2^(1/2)*a4^(1/2)/t)*exp((-a4-a2)/t)*a4^(1/2)*a2^(1/2)+BesselK(1, 2*a1^(1/2)*a3^(1/2)/t)*exp((-a3-a1)/t)*a1^(1/2)*a3^(1/2))/t
Kevin B
Kevin B le 12 Nov 2017
Thank you so much!

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Plus de réponses (1)

BeeTiaw
BeeTiaw le 5 Août 2020

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Bessel functions dans Help Center et File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by