Creating a matrix of ones and zeros with location of ones based on array value
17 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
Melissa Moore
le 8 Avr 2019
Modifié(e) : madhan ravi
le 9 Avr 2019
I need to acheive the following without a loop (for speed):
I have a vertical array where the value of each row tells me which column in a matrix of zeros should be replaced with a one.
For example, if I input:
y = [2; 3];
Then I want MATLAB to produce output:
Y = [0,1,0; 0, 0, 1];
I can acheive the desired output with the following for loop:
Y = zeros(2,3);
for j = 1:3
Y(:,j) = (y==j);
end
In reality, my matrices are much larger and I want to avoid using for loops for speed. Is there anyway I can do this without a for loop?
1 commentaire
madhan ravi
le 9 Avr 2019
Modifié(e) : madhan ravi
le 9 Avr 2019
@ Melissa Moore :Are you interested in a faster solution still? If yes another solution can be proposed.
Réponse acceptée
Kevin Rawson
le 8 Avr 2019
One possible way is:
Y = zeros(length(y), max(y));
Y(sub2ind(size(Y), (1:length(y))', y)) = 1;
0 commentaires
Plus de réponses (2)
A. Sawas
le 8 Avr 2019
Modifié(e) : A. Sawas
le 8 Avr 2019
The best solution I can think of is to use a for loop but will be faster than the one you showed because it will do one scalar assignment in each iteration compared to a vector assignment.
for j=1:2
Y(j,y(j)) = 1;
end
1 commentaire
Kevin Rawson
le 8 Avr 2019
Modifié(e) : Kevin Rawson
le 8 Avr 2019
A. Sawas, your method is faster for small arrays, but not for large arrays. I'm using your 10,000x10,000 example with y assigned to the diagonal (see code above).
Sawas method (run 10000 times):
tic;
for i=1:10000
for j=1:length(y)
Y(j,y(j)) = 1;
end
end;
toc;
%Elapsed time is 1.682664 seconds.
Rawson method (run 10000 times):
tic;
for i=1:10000
Y(ind2sub(1:length(y), y)) = 1;
end
toc;
%Elapsed time is 0.596671 seconds.
Melissa Moore
le 8 Avr 2019
3 commentaires
Kevin Phung
le 8 Avr 2019
Is Melissa's solution a valid solution?... IMO, I is a diagonal matrix where there are already existing 1's. And this is not what you want.
A. Sawas's is valid and more efficient.
Kevin Rawson
le 8 Avr 2019
Modifié(e) : Kevin Rawson
le 9 Avr 2019
However, as A. Sawas pointed out, this is an extremely slow operation, ~700 times slower than A. Sawas' method, and ~1988 times slower than my method for a 10,000x10,000 array.
Voir également
Catégories
En savoir plus sur Loops and Conditional Statements dans Help Center et File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!