can this 'for loop' be replaced? thanks in advance
counts=[];
for i=1 : length(b)-1
c=length(tof( tof >= b(i) & tof < b(i+1)) ) ;
counts=[counts,c];
end

 Réponse acceptée

Jan
Jan le 7 Nov 2019
Modifié(e) : Jan le 7 Nov 2019

0 votes

A ,ore efficient version of the loop:
nb = numel(b) - 1;
counts = zeros(1, nb); % Pre-allocation!!!
for i = 1:nb
counts(i) = sum(tof >= b(i) & tof < b(i+1));
end
Is tof a scalar or a vector? Is b sorted? Are you looking for histcounts ?
Pre-allocation is essential, because letting an array grow iteratively is extremely expensive.

2 commentaires

sb
sb le 7 Nov 2019
this loop works well and is 1.5 times faster. tof is a scaler, b is sorted, I am looking at histcouts without matlab's inbuilt code.
Image Analyst
Image Analyst le 7 Nov 2019
Not sure what that means exactly, but if you need more help, attach your data and the desired/expected output.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Plus de réponses (1)

Image Analyst
Image Analyst le 7 Nov 2019

0 votes

Try this (untested)
lastIndex = length(b)-1;
indexes = (tof > b(1:lastIndex)) & (tof < b(2:lastIndex + 1));
counts = cumsum(indexes)

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Loops and Conditional Statements dans Centre d'aide et File Exchange

Tags

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by