Effacer les filtres
Effacer les filtres

FFT with normalized spatial frequency for image sensor MTF

49 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Ben Hendrickson
Ben Hendrickson le 19 Avr 2020
Commenté : Ali Madani le 22 Oct 2020
I'm attempting to use the slanted edge method to calculate the MTF for a camera system according to Harvest Imaging (https://harvestimaging.com/blog/?p=1328), and struggling to plot the result correctly. The method involves taking the Fourier transform of a line spread function and plotting it from DC to the sampling frequency. I have chosen the sampling frequency to equal 2, since that is the minimum number of pixels required to record contrast. Here is my code:
LSF = [];
LSF(1:250) = 0;
LSF(51:70) = 140;
Fs = 2; % Sampling frequency (pixels/lp)
T = 1/Fs; % Sampling period (lp/pixel)
L = length(LSF); % Length of signal (length of line in pixels)
P2 = abs(fft(LSF/L));
P1 = P2(1:L/2+1);
P1(2:end-1) = 2*P1(2:end-1);
f = Fs*(0:(L/2))/L;
nP1 = P1-min(P1);
nP1 = nP1./max(nP1);
plot(f,nP1,'linewidth',3)
title('MTF')
xlabel('Normalized Spatial Frequency')
According to the example, I should reach my first minimum of the sinc function at x=1
But, I appear to be off by a factor of 10.
Can anyone point out where I'm going wrong? I'm sure it's a simple fix.
Thanks much!
  7 commentaires
Ben Hendrickson
Ben Hendrickson le 21 Avr 2020
Appreciate the links! I agree that it should be obtained in cycles/pixel, then coverted to lp/mm. The problem may have to do with the say the initial function (SFR) is plotted. The idea is to super-resolve the edge, which means it should be plotted against fractions of a pixel. Mine is not. I'll keep banging my head against it and let you know when I've figured it out.
Thanks for talking it out with me!
Ali Madani
Ali Madani le 22 Oct 2020
Hi Ben, did you figure out how to normalized the x-axis? I've been having the same question and cannot figure out how to do this.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Réponses (1)

Jack
Jack le 22 Avr 2020
Modifié(e) : Jack le 22 Avr 2020
Hi Ben,
You are off by a factor of 10 because there are 10 samples in one of your 'pixels'. The result of the FT is in cycles/set, which can also be expressed in other units as shown below (see here for a detailed explanation). I used similar figures to yours that however result in the sinc having samples at MTF nulls.
Jack
n = 256; %samples per set
px = 16; %samples per pixel
LSF = zeros(1,n);
LSF(1:px)=140; %the pixel has intensity 140
MTF = 1/sum(LSF) * abs(fft(LSF));
f = 0:n-1; %cycles per set
figure; plot(f,MTF); %cycles per set
xlabel('cycles/set'); ylabel('MTF')
figure; plot(f/n,MTF); %cycles per sample
xlabel('cycles/sample'); ylabel('MTF')
figure; plot (f/n*px,MTF) %cycles per pixel
xlabel('cycles/pixel'); ylabel('MTF'); xlim([0 1])

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Graphics Performance dans Help Center et File Exchange

Produits

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by