Effacer les filtres
Effacer les filtres

Getting details about the source of an exception in c++ mex

1 vue (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Manuel Schaich
Manuel Schaich le 14 Mai 2020
Hello,
I have implemented a mex c++ interface to a nonlinear programming solver and until now it worked great. I am trying to cover special cases and when trying to deal with vanishing Hessians it seems to have a werid issue and I cannot detemine where it comes from. I am getting confusing information about where the problem occurs but it seems somehow related to sparse matrices. So I attach my class members that interface to the Jacobian and Hessian.
When I attach the debugger (XCode) for some reason it crashes matlab, without the debugger an exception is thrown and a regular error tells me Can't index into an empty array - obviously not having the debugger working is not ideal. According to my printout the last call I get on the output comes from the Jacobian evaluation, but after the succesfull passing of the numerical values. For the one with the debugger attached, the crashdump points to the Hessian evaluation.
Is there a way to determine where the exception was thrown in the c++ stack? Currently I only have this info:
MException with properties:
identifier: 'MATLAB:mex:CppMexException'
message: 'Can't index into an empty array'
cause: {}
stack: [2×1 struct]
Correction: []
and the stack is on the Matlab side.
Thank you,
Manuel
bool eval_jac_g(Index n, const Number* x, bool new_x,
Index m, Index nele_jac, Index* iRow, Index *jCol,
Number* values)
{
#if defined(DBG)
std::cout << "Called eval_jac_g" << std::endl;
#endif
if (nullptr == values){
std::vector<Array> args(0);
std::vector<Array> jacStrOut = feval(funcs[0]["jacobianstructure"], 1, args);
SparseArray<double> JacobianStr(std::move(jacStrOut[0]));
#if defined(DBG)
std::cout << " --- Jacobian Structure ---" << std::endl;
#endif
auto i = 0;
for (TypedIterator<double> it = JacobianStr.begin(); it != JacobianStr.end(); it++){
iRow[i] = JacobianStr.getIndex(it).first;
jCol[i] = JacobianStr.getIndex(it).second;
#if defined(DBG)
std::cout << "iRow[" << i << "] = " << iRow[i] << " jCol[" << i << "] = " << jCol[i] << std::endl;
#endif
i++;
}
} else {
if (new_x)
updateX(x);
#if defined(DBG)
std::cout << " --- Jacobian values ---" << std::endl;
#endif
SparseArray<double> Jacobian = fevalWithX(funcs[0]["jacobian"]);
auto i = 0;
for (auto& elem : Jacobian){
#if defined(DBG)
std::cout << "values[" << i << "] = " << elem << std::endl;
#endif
values[i] = elem;
i++;
}
}
return true;
};
bool eval_h(Index n, const Number* x, bool new_x,
Number obj_factor, Index m, const Number* lambda,
bool new_lambda, Index nele_hess, Index* iRow,
Index* jCol, Number* values)
{
#if defined(DBG)
std::cout << "Called eval_h" << std::endl;
#endif
assert(!returnHessian);
if (nullptr == values){
Array hessianStructure = funcs[0]["hessianstructure"];
std::vector<Array> args(0);
std::vector<Array> hesStrOut = feval(hessianStructure, 1, args);
SparseArray<double> HessianStr(std::move(hesStrOut[0]));
auto i = 0;
for (TypedIterator<double> it = HessianStr.begin(); it != HessianStr.end(); it++){
iRow[i] = HessianStr.getIndex(it).first;
jCol[i] = HessianStr.getIndex(it).second;
i++;
}
} else {
if (new_x)
updateX(x);
std::vector<Array> hessianArgs = {
args[0],
factory.createScalar(obj_factor),
factory.createArray<double>({static_cast<size_t>(m),1}, lambda, lambda + m)
};
std::vector<Array> retVals = feval(funcs[0]["hessian"], 1, hessianArgs);
SparseArray<double> Hessian = std::move(retVals[0]);
auto i = 0;
for (auto& elem : Hessian){
values[i] = elem;
i++;
}
}
return true;
};

Réponse acceptée

Manuel Schaich
Manuel Schaich le 16 Mai 2020
So I found out why XCode wouldn't work correctly for the debugging. I updated to 2020a but had not updated the path to the attached binary in the schema. Strangely it did cause Matlab to crash despite not really being attached. But with the regular debugger I found the issue. Had nothing to do with either Jacobian nor Hessian. In some degenerate case the finalise solution call would not be made, I had initialised the returned structure there. Hence it was trying to set fields on an empty structure and the api didn't like it.

Plus de réponses (0)

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Programming dans Help Center et File Exchange

Produits


Version

R2020a

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by