How to create a large matrix using another matrix
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
Hello everyone, I want to make a large matrix (10^7 x 10^7) but it needs to have the following matrix being repeated around its main diagonal.
a=4;
A=[1 0 a+1 0;
a+2 2 0 a+1;
0 a+2 3 0;
0 0 a+2 4];
As you can see it is a main diagonal with 1:10^7 and 1 row lower repeating the number 6 and 2 rows higher repeating the number 5.
Everything I have tried turns out to be huge in terms of memory and unable to be performed like that. I suppose the trick is by somehow making use of a sparse matrix, but I cannot get it to work properly.
Thanks a lot in advance!
8 commentaires
Steven Lord
le 30 Mai 2020
What are you trying to do with this large matrix? Are you trying to use it to solve a system of equations? If so consider instead using one of the iterative solvers in MATLAB. Most if not all of those solvers can operate on either an explicit coefficient matrix A or a function that performs one or both of A*x or A'*x, where x is a column vector. If your coefficient matrix has a pattern (as yours apparently does) you may be able to compute A*x and A'*x without explicitly forming A.
Petros Tsitouras
le 1 Juin 2020
Walter Roberson
le 1 Juin 2020
You should rarely be using inv() on any matrix that is more than about 4 x 4, and even then only on symbolic matrices. In other cases you should be using the \ operator. The \ operator should be able to detect that it is a band-restricted sparse system and use a more efficient solver.
Petros Tsitouras
le 1 Juin 2020
Walter Roberson
le 1 Juin 2020
What error is that?
a=4;
N=1E7;
Adiag=(1:N).';
A1=ones(N,1)*(a+2);
A2=ones(N,1)*(a+1);
Acom=[A2, Adiag, zeros(N,1), A1];
B=spdiags(Acom,-1:2,N,N);
C = ones(N,1);
sol = B\C;
On my system the solution is found about 1.6 seconds with no memory problems. Memory use peaks about less than 6 gigabytes on my system.
Petros Tsitouras
le 1 Juin 2020
Modifié(e) : Petros Tsitouras
le 1 Juin 2020
Walter Roberson
le 1 Juin 2020
Your original request shows the a+2 below the diagonal, so anything that ends up with the 6 above the diagonal is a wrong approach ;-)
The approach I used of constructing columns instead of rows has the advantage of not needing to transpose Acom, and so is more efficient.
Petros Tsitouras
le 1 Juin 2020
Réponse acceptée
Plus de réponses (0)
Catégories
En savoir plus sur Creating and Concatenating Matrices dans Centre d'aide et File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!



