what's wrong in this algorithm? is a "numerical instability" problem?

3 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
max
max le 11 Jan 2013
I've created an algorithm that implement the real time subspace tracking, but the simulink results and the matlab results are different. I need to implement the algorithm on simulink, cause I use D-space, which needs simulink source.
The correct results are the matlab ones, I fragmented the algorithm and I have discovered that the origin of the differences is in one single simulink block, which does simple operations, as matrix moltiplications, matrix transpose, and add/remove column from matrix.
In particular, there is an error about 10^-12 between matlab and simulink, after matrix moltiplication.
The matrix is a 400X10, I've initialized it as eye(400,10), the data type is double.
I've already written on this forum, and you answer to me that the problem may be a numerical instability of my algorithm. But the fragment of the algorithm which gives me problem, is very simple. The input signal is a sum of 3 sine waves. After there is an if subsystem ( I have to fill a mobile vector, before doing some math operations). I use 2 s-function builder :first s-function is very simple, there is only 1 assignment operation. The second one implements some sequences of givens rotations, but the code is correct: I've tested it.
I have a feedback after the s function who implement givens rotations, and I use a memory block to store in memory the matrix for the next step.
I've observed that when the matrix is filled only by ones and zeros, the error (between simu e matlab) is 10^-12. After the first step, the matrix is filled by other numbers, and after the first matrix moltiplication, the result begins to diverge from the matlab result.
I think that this divergence increase step by step, and it becomes 10^3 (in about 15 steps), but not more than 10^3 in the next steps. The final results in the simulink results is not acceptable.
How can I resolve this problem? What is wrong?
P.s. I use some switch blocks, may be an important detail.
thank you for the answers.

Réponses (1)

Jan
Jan le 2 Août 2013
Did you check the validity of the Simulink block until you are sure, that they do not contain a bug? "matrix multiplications, matrix transpose, and add/remove column from matrix" could be prone to rounding errors e.g. when multiplications are performed in a different order. But a bug is possible also.

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Simulink Functions dans Help Center et File Exchange

Produits

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by