Why bad partial differentiation?
1 vue (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
Hi, I've a problem with this:
input parameter to my function is degree-it's number
There is a reason why I need m0,phi0 and not l0
m=sym('m',[1,degree]);
m=[m0 m];
l=sym('l',[degree,1]);
phi=sym('phi',[1,degree]);
phi=[phi0 phi] ;
for i=1:length(phi)
phi(i)=strcat(char(phi(i)),'(t)');
end
B=(1/2)*l(1)*m(2)*diff(phi(1),t)*diff(phi(2),t)*cos(phi(2))
phit=phi(2)
subs(diff(subs(B, phit, 'phit'),'phit'),'phit', phit)
I want to derive according to phi1(t), and the result is 0, but I expect (-1/2)*l1*m1*diff(phi0(t),t)*diff(phi1(t),t)*sin(phi1(t))
BUT, when I derive this B=(1/2)*l(1)*m(2)*diff(phi(1),t)*cos(phi(2)), it's all righ,
Any help would be appreciated
4 commentaires
Réponse acceptée
Walter Roberson
le 9 Mar 2013
The MuPAD Symbolic Toolbox cannot differentiate with respect to a function. (Maple cannot either.)
5 commentaires
Walter Roberson
le 10 Mar 2013
In that case, you are differentiating with respect to a variable, not a function. Keep in mind that you are passing in 'phit' as a string, not phit by value (not quotation marks), so the symbol formed from 'phit' is going to be divorced from the phi(2) that appears in the expression.
The existence of the factor in your original expression of diff(phi(2),t) makes it especially questionable to differentiate a multiple of that factor by phi(2).
Plus de réponses (0)
Voir également
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!