Improving the speed of code with passing to a function input a cell array or structure.
2 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
George Bashkatov
le 3 Avr 2021
Commenté : George Bashkatov
le 4 Avr 2021
I'm trying to pass some amount of numerical data as a function input.
I had that row in my code:
[z1,y1]=ode45(@(z,y) famplifire(sigma_pa,N0,sigma_pe,sigma_se,k,y,z),zspan,startval);
I'm trying to replace four parameters: sigma_pa,N0,sigma_pe,sigma_se. I've tryed to replace them with cell array, but the time of execution of code nevertheless rises. So I had some questions:
1) Using of cell arrays insted of usual numerical data can improve quickness of my code?
2) I had another idea to use a struct, but I don't know how. If you can, give me some advices (or simple examples) please. Or I can make another question with my code.
0 commentaires
Réponse acceptée
Matt J
le 3 Avr 2021
Modifié(e) : Matt J
le 3 Avr 2021
We can't see what famplifire [sic.] is doing with your variables so there isn't any specific comments that can be made. However, the rule of thumb is basically that if you must loop through a small number of large arrays/matrices, it can be advantageous to hold them in cells. Otherwise, it is probably better to concatenate them into a single array.
Structures are essentially the same as cell arrays. They are just indexed differently.
3 commentaires
Matt J
le 3 Avr 2021
If the C{i} are all scalars, it would be better if C were numeric rather than a cell array
Plus de réponses (0)
Voir également
Catégories
En savoir plus sur Creating and Concatenating Matrices dans Help Center et File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!