Effacer les filtres
Effacer les filtres

Uniformly distributed random variables

2 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Anand Kumar
Anand Kumar le 5 Avr 2021
Commenté : Anand Kumar le 5 Avr 2021
Iam stuck in a part of the following question-
Plot the distribution of two resistors in a parallel connection assuming that they each have measured values, which vary uniformly about their nominal values by ±5%
I have approached this problem in the following way -
x = zeros(10000,1) ;
R1 = rand(1,1) ;
R2 = rand(1,1) ;
for i = 1:10000
x(i,1) = (R1*R2)/(R1+R2) ;
end
histogram(x,'normalization','pdf')
RIght now I dont have the idea about how to adjust the nominal values in the rand function . Please help :)
  1 commentaire
the cyclist
the cyclist le 5 Avr 2021
I edited your code using the CODE button in the toolbar, and run it, show in your plot.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Réponse acceptée

Chad Greene
Chad Greene le 5 Avr 2021
Ah, this is a fun question, because the concept it's getting at is quite common across science and engineering.
The process of manufacturing resistors isn't perfect, so a 100 Ohm resistor might actually have a value anywhere between 95 and 105 Ohms. To make a uniform distribution of values between 95 and 105 Ohms, you could use the rand function, which creates values between 0 and 1. This means you'll want to multiply rand by 2 times the full spread, and center it so half the values are less than zero and half the values are greater than zero.
percent_error = 5;
NominalResistance = 100;
ErrorDistribution = 2*(percent_error/100)*NominalResistance*(rand(1000,1)-0.5);
R = NominalResistance + ErrorDistribution;
histogram(R)
  2 commentaires
Chad Greene
Chad Greene le 5 Avr 2021
Hint: the next-level solution, however would use randn instead of rand, because errors are most likely gaussian rather than uniform distribution. I'd consider using randn and thinking about how to scale it accordingly to result in +/-5% error.
Anand Kumar
Anand Kumar le 5 Avr 2021
Thanks Chad for the explanation.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Plus de réponses (2)

David Hill
David Hill le 5 Avr 2021
nomR1=1000;
nomR2=2000;
R1=nomR1*(.05*(2*rand(1,1e4)-1)+1);
R2=nomR2*(.05*(2*rand(1,1e4)-1)+1);
x=(R1.*R2)./(R1+R2);
  2 commentaires
the cyclist
the cyclist le 5 Avr 2021
@Anand Kumar, my advice to you would be to try to solve your homework yourself with the hints I gave, before blindly copying this solution. That's the way to learn.
Anand Kumar
Anand Kumar le 5 Avr 2021
Thank you David. @the cyclist Thanks for your advice , I won't copy.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.


the cyclist
the cyclist le 5 Avr 2021
The main reason your output looks like this is that you are only generating ONE random value for each resistor -- and then recalculating x over and over again, with those values.
So, you need to change your code so that you generate a new random value for each value of x. (Check out the documentation on rand to see how to generate many values at once.)
You can generate a uniform random value with mean m and width w by doing
m = 37;
w = 2;
R1 = m + w*(rand(1,1) - 0.5)
R1 = 37.8963
  1 commentaire
Anand Kumar
Anand Kumar le 5 Avr 2021
Yes I got the point . Thank you for the explanation :)

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by