bvp4c or classical odesolver
Infos
Cette question est clôturée. Rouvrir pour modifier ou répondre.
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
Hello,
i solved an initial BVP by the method of lines in the following way:
i=1;
dvdt(i)= -omega^2/dx.*((xcen(i)-0.5*dx)*feo('ffun',v(i),v(i+1))) + ...
1/dx^2*(Ax(i+1)-Ax(i));
i=2:N-1;
dvdt(i)= -omega^2/dx.*((xcen(i)+0.5*dx).*F(i)...
-(xcen(i)-0.5*dx).*F(i-1)) + 1/dx^2*(Ax(i+1)-2*Ax(i)+Ax(i-1));
i=N;
dvdt(i)= omega^2/dx*(xcen(end)-0.5*dx)*feo('ffun',v(i-1),v(i)) - ...
1/dx^2*(Ax(i)-Ax(i-1));
Is it better or probably faster to use bvp4c instead ? What are the reasons why i would like to use bvp4c and not the approach i used ?
Any comments are appreciated
Best Wishes
Moritz
Réponses (0)
Cette question est clôturée.
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!