Effacer les filtres
Effacer les filtres

How do I efficiently calculate a scalar distance with 3d geometry?

8 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Henry
Henry le 29 Juil 2013
I have a piece of code that is called many times (~5e5) during a time stepping solution. Having run profiler, the following line is slowing everything down:
r2 = sqrt((x-x2).*(x-x2)+(y-y2).*(y-y2)+(z-z2).*(z-z2));
Where x, y, z are (500, 1) and x2, y2, z2 are scalars.
Any suggestions?
Thanks!

Réponses (2)

Matt J
Matt J le 29 Juil 2013
This might speed things up,
Haven't used it myself, though.
  2 commentaires
Matt J
Matt J le 30 Juil 2013
Modifié(e) : Matt J le 30 Juil 2013
It should also help (a little) if you don't compute x-x2 etc... twice. So in other words, you would first do
dx=x-x2;
dy=y-y2;
dz=z-z2;
and then
r2 = sqrt(dx.*dx +dy.*dy +dz.*dz);
or whatever...
Jan
Jan le 30 Juil 2013
DNorm2 requires matrices as input and creating [dx, dy, dz] at first wastes too much time. So if the data could be organized as [500 x 3] matrix instead of three vectors, DNorm2 would be an option.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.


Richard Brown
Richard Brown le 29 Juil 2013
Modifié(e) : Richard Brown le 29 Juil 2013
You should use hypot. It also has better numerical stability.
edit sorry, you're in 3D. That obviously won't work. You can use hypot as
r = hypot((x-x2) + 1i*(y-y2), z - z2);
This may be slower than what you currently have though. If you use (x - x2).^2 instead of (x - x2) .* (x - x2) you'll probably get a small performance boost. Can you avoid calculating the square root and work with squared distance instead?

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Creating and Concatenating Matrices dans Help Center et File Exchange

Tags

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by