I struggle with this generally and have come up against a barrier again.
I'm trying to create vibrational mode functions for a rectangular membrane. The equation is simple enough: -
W_n = sin(x*pi*i/L_x)*sin(y*pi*i/L_y)
Here's where I'm up to: -
L_x = 27.4e-3; %membrane width (m)
L_y = 27.4e-3; %membrane height (m)
N_x = 10; %no. of eigenfreqs considered in x dimension
N_y = 10; %no. of eigenfreqs considered in y dimension
N = N_x*N_y; %total no. of eigenfreqs considered
x = (linspace(0.5*L_x/N_x,L_x - 0.5*L_x/N_x,N_x))';
%membrane x-dimension mapping points
%each at the centre of an element
y = (linspace(0.5*L_y/N_y,L_y - 0.5*L_y/N_y,N_y));
%membrane y-dimension mapping points
%each at the centre of an element
x_ref = 1:length(x);
y_ref = 1:length(y);
W_n = zeros(N_x,N_y,N);
W_n(:,:,01) = (sin(x(x_ref,:,:)*1*pi/L_x)...
*sin(y(:,y_ref,:)*1*pi/L_y));
W_n(:,:,02) = (sin(x(x_ref,:,:)*1*pi/L_x)...
*sin(y(:,y_ref,:)*2*pi/L_y));
W_n(:,:,18) = (sin(x(x_ref,:,:)*2*pi/L_x)...
*sin(y(:,y_ref,:)*8*pi/L_y));
W_n(:,:,46) = (sin(x(x_ref,:,:)*5*pi/L_x)...
*sin(y(:,y_ref,:)*6*pi/L_y));
W_n(:,:,89) = (sin(x(x_ref,:,:)*9*pi/L_x)...
*sin(y(:,y_ref,:)*9*pi/L_y));
W_n(:,:,100) = (sin(x(x_ref,:,:)*10*pi/L_x)...
*sin(y(:,y_ref,:)*10*pi/L_y));
The numbers on the left hand side - 01, 02, 18, 46, 89, 100 - actually need to be 1,2,3,...,100, i.e.
n = 1:100; %mode number counting from 1 to 100
These refer to the mode numbers - although this is a bit odd - but still not too complicated. Basically if n = 01, then the mode is (1,1). If n = 59 the mode is (6,9), i.e. i = 6 & j = 9. I have solved this using the following: -
i = floor((n/10 - n/1000)) + 1;
%mode number from 1 to 10 in x dimension
j = n - 10*(floor((n/10 - n/1000)));
%mode number from 1 to 10 in y dimension
Now I just need to put n, i and j into my W_n equation, but I can't figure out how!
Any help would be greatly appreciated :)

 Réponse acceptée

Simon
Simon le 19 Sep 2013

0 votes

Hi!
I don't understand why the x and y spacing depends on the number of modes/frequencies.
Take a look at the following code:
L_x = 27.4e-3; %membrane width (m)
L_y = 27.4e-3; %membrane height (m)
N_x = 5; %no. of eigenfreqs considered in x dimension
N_y = 10; %no. of eigenfreqs considered in y dimension
N = N_x*N_y; %total no. of eigenfreqs considered
NumX = 50; % number of mapping points in x-direction
NumY = 50; % number of mapping points in y-direction
% create X and Y array in 2d
[X,Y] = meshgrid(...
(linspace(0.5*L_y/NumY, L_y - 0.5*L_y/NumY, NumY)), ...
(linspace(0.5*L_x/NumX, L_x - 0.5*L_x/NumX, NumX)));
% modify X and Y array for 3d
XFull = repmat(X, [1 1 N]);
YFull = repmat(Y, [1 1 N]);
% create mode array for X
Mx = ones(NumX, NumY, N_y);
MxFull = [];
for n = 1:N_x
MxFull = cat(3, MxFull, n*Mx);
end
% create mode array for Y
My = ones(NumX, NumY);
MyFull = [];
for n = 1:N_y
MyFull = cat(3, MyFull, n*My);
end
MyFull = repmat(MyFull, [1 1 N_x]);
% modes for each direction
Wx_n = arrayfun(@(x,mx) sin(x .* (mx *pi/L_x)), XFull, MxFull);
Wy_n = arrayfun(@(y,my) sin(y .* (my *pi/L_x)), YFull, MyFull);
% superposition of modes
W_n = Wx_n .* Wy_n;
% plot
figure(1); cla
surface(W_n(:,:,23));

7 commentaires

Tom
Tom le 19 Sep 2013
Sorry - yeah I didn't explain that. I don't know for sure (I'm replicating this theory from a few papers on the subject), but I'm pretty sure it is basically that if the maximum no. of modes is (10,10), then the least number of elements needed to give a basic representation of this with any degree of accuracy would be an mesh made up of 10x10 elements. The x-y points are points at the centre of each element.
I'll check out the code now...
I agree with the number of elements vs. number of modes. It's kind of sampling theorem of sin function. But keep in mind that it is the least number. Compare the code above for
N_x = 10;
N_y = 10;
NumX = 10;
NumY = 10;
and
N_x = 10;
N_y = 10;
NumX = 100;
NumY = 100;
Look at
surface(W_n(:,:,100));
Tom
Tom le 19 Sep 2013
That is amazing thank you so much. One thing - when the plot seems to start from 1 in both x and y dimensions rather than 0. Is there a way of getting it to from 0?
Use the real x and y coordinates of the mapping points
figure(1); cla
surface((linspace(0.5*L_y/NumY,L_y - 0.5*L_y/NumY,NumY)), ...
(linspace(0.5*L_x/NumX,L_x - 0.5*L_x/NumX,NumX)), ...
W_n(:,:,100));
axis tight
Tom
Tom le 19 Sep 2013
That's perfect - thank you!!
Tom
Tom le 20 Déc 2013
Hi again Simon, I'm just getting into this again and I've noticed that when I examine the 1st mode, it appears off-centre - whereas it should be completely central on the membrane.
This can be seen when the end of the surface command is
W_n(:,:,1);
Do you know why this is?
Many thanks,
Tom
Tom
Tom le 20 Déc 2013
I think I may have solved this by using
(linspace(L_y/NumY, L_y, NumY))
instead of
(linspace(0.5*L_y/NumY,L_y - 0.5*L_y/NumY,NumY))
Do you think this solution is correct?
Thanks

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Plus de réponses (0)

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Mathematics dans Centre d'aide et File Exchange

Produits

Question posée :

Tom
le 19 Sep 2013

Commenté :

Tom
le 20 Déc 2013

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by