Differential algebraic equations are a type of differential
equation where one or more derivatives of dependent variables are
not present in the equations. Variables that appear in the equations
without their derivative are called *algebraic*,
and the presence of algebraic variables means that you cannot write
down the equations in the explicit form $$y\text{'}=f\left(t,y\right)$$.
Instead, you can solve DAEs with these forms:

The

`ode15s`

and`ode23t`

solvers can solve index-1 linearly implicit problems with a singular mass matrix $$M\left(t,y\right)y\text{'}=f\left(t,y\right)$$, including semi-explicit DAEs of the form$$\begin{array}{c}y\text{'}=f\left(t,y,z\right)\\ 0=g\left(t,y,z\right)\text{\hspace{0.17em}}.\end{array}$$

In this form, the presence of algebraic variables leads to a singular mass matrix, since there are one or more zeros on the main diagonal.

$$My\text{'}=\left(\begin{array}{cccc}y{\text{'}}_{1}& 0& \cdots & 0\\ 0& y{\text{'}}_{2}& 0& \vdots \\ \vdots & 0& \ddots & 0\\ 0& \cdots & 0& 0\end{array}\right)\text{\hspace{0.17em}}.$$

By default, solvers automatically test the singularity of the mass matrix to detect DAE systems. If you know about singularity ahead of time then you can set the

`MassSingular`

option of`odeset`

to`'yes'`

. With DAEs, you can also provide the solver with a guess of the initial conditions for $$y{\text{'}}_{0}$$ using the`InitialSlope`

property of`odeset`

. This is in addition to specifying the usual initial conditions for $${y}_{0}$$ in the call to the solver.The

`ode15i`

solver can solve more general DAEs in the fully implicit form$$f\left(t,y,y\text{'}\right)=0\text{\hspace{0.17em}}.$$

In the fully implicit form, the presence of algebraic variables leads to a singular Jacobian matrix. This is because at least one of the columns in the matrix is guaranteed to contain all zeros, since the derivative of that variable does not appear in the equations.

$$J=\partial f/\partial y\text{'}=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}\frac{\partial {f}_{1}}{\partial y{\text{'}}_{1}}& \cdots & \frac{\partial {f}_{1}}{\partial y{\text{'}}_{n}}\\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ \frac{\partial {f}_{m}}{\partial y{\text{'}}_{1}}& \cdots & \frac{\partial {f}_{m}}{\partial y{\text{'}}_{n}}\end{array}\right)$$

The

`ode15i`

solver requires that you specify initial conditions for both $$y{\text{'}}_{0}$$ and $${y}_{0}$$. Also, unlike the other ODE solvers,`ode15i`

requires the function encoding the equations to accept an extra input:`odefun(t,y,yp)`

.

DAEs arise in a wide variety of systems because physical conservation
laws often have forms like $$x+y+z=0$$.
If `x`

, `x'`

, `y`

,
and `y'`

are defined explicitly in the equations,
then this conservation equation is sufficient to solve for `z`

without
having an expression for `z'`

.

When you are solving a DAE, you can specify initial conditions
for both $$y{\text{'}}_{0}$$ and $${y}_{0}$$.
The `ode15i`

solver requires both initial conditions
to be specified as input arguments. For the `ode15s`

and `ode23t`

solvers,
the initial condition for $$y{\text{'}}_{0}$$ is
optional (but can be specified using the `InitialSlope`

option
of `odeset`

). In both cases, it is possible that
the initial conditions you specify do not agree with the equations
you are trying to solve. Initial conditions that conflict with one
another are called *inconsistent*. The treatment
of the initial conditions varies by solver:

`ode15s`

and`ode23t`

— If you do not specify an initial condition for $$y{\text{'}}_{0}$$, then the solver automatically computes consistent initial conditions based on the initial condition you provide for $${y}_{0}$$. If you specify an inconsistent initial condition for $$y{\text{'}}_{0}$$, then the solver treats the values as guesses, attempts to compute consistent values close to the guesses, and continues on to solve the problem.`ode15i`

— The initial conditions you supply to the solver must be consistent, and`ode15i`

does not check the supplied values for consistency. The helper function`decic`

computes consistent initial conditions for this purpose.

DAEs are characterized by their *differential index*,
which is a measure of their singularity. By differentiating equations
you can eliminate algebraic variables, and if you do this enough times
then the equations take the form of a system of explicit ODEs. The
differential index of a system of DAEs is the number of derivatives
you must take to express the system as an equivalent system of explicit
ODEs. Thus, ODEs have a differential index of 0.

An example of an index-1 DAE is

$$y\left(t\right)=k\left(t\right)\text{\hspace{0.17em}}.$$

For this equation, you can take a single derivative to obtain the explicit ODE form

$$y\text{'}=k\text{'}\left(t\right)\text{\hspace{0.17em}}.$$

An example of an index-2 DAE is

$$\begin{array}{l}y{\text{'}}_{1}={y}_{2}\\ 0=k\left(t\right)-{y}_{1}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}.\end{array}$$

These equations require two derivatives to be rewritten in the explicit ODE form

$$\begin{array}{l}y{\text{'}}_{1}=k\text{'}\left(t\right)\\ y{\text{'}}_{2}=k\text{'}\text{'}\left(t\right)\text{\hspace{0.17em}}.\end{array}$$

The `ode15s`

and `ode23t`

solvers
only solve DAEs of index 1. If the index of your equations is 2 or
higher, then you need to rewrite the equations as an equivalent system
of index-1 DAEs. It is always possible to take derivatives and rewrite
a DAE system as an equivalent system of index-1 DAEs. Be aware that
if you replace algebraic equations with their derivatives, then you
might have removed some constraints. If the equations no longer include
the original constraints, then the numerical solution can drift.

If you have Symbolic Math Toolbox™, then see Solve Differential Algebraic Equations (DAEs) (Symbolic Math Toolbox) for more information.

Most of the options in `odeset`

work as
expected with the DAE solvers `ode15s`

,
`ode23t`

, and `ode15i`

. However, one
notable exception is with the use of the `NonNegative`

option.
The `NonNegative`

option does not support implicit solvers
(`ode15s`

, `ode23t`

,
`ode23tb`

) applied to problems with a mass matrix. Therefore,
you cannot use this option to impose nonnegativity constraints on a DAE problem,
which necessarily has a singular mass matrix. For more details, see [1].

This example reformulates a system of ODEs as a system of differential algebraic equations (DAEs). The Robertson problem found in hb1ode.m is a classic test problem for programs that solve stiff ODEs. The system of equations is

`hb1ode`

solves this system of ODEs to steady state with the initial conditions , , and . But the equations also satisfy a linear conservation law,

In terms of the solution and initial conditions, the conservation law is

The system of equations can be rewritten as a system of DAEs by using the conservation law to determine the state of . This reformulates the problem as the DAE system

The differential index of this system is 1, since only a single derivative of is required to make this a system of ODEs. Therefore, no further transformations are required before solving the system.

The function `robertsdae`

encodes this DAE system. Save `robertsdae.m`

in your current folder to run the example.

```
function out = robertsdae(t,y)
out = [-0.04*y(1) + 1e4*y(2).*y(3)
0.04*y(1) - 1e4*y(2).*y(3) - 3e7*y(2).^2
y(1) + y(2) + y(3) - 1 ];
```

The full example code for this formulation of the Robertson problem is available in hb1dae.m.

Solve the DAE system using `ode15s`

. Consistent initial conditions for `y0`

are obvious based on the conservation law. Use `odeset`

to set the options:

Use a constant mass matrix to represent the left hand side of the system of equations.

Set the relative error tolerance to

`1e-4`

.Use an absolute tolerance of

`1e-10`

for the second solution component, since the scale varies dramatically from the other components.Leave the

`'MassSingular'`

option at its default value`'maybe'`

to test the automatic detection of a DAE.

y0 = [1; 0; 0]; tspan = [0 4*logspace(-6,6)]; M = [1 0 0; 0 1 0; 0 0 0]; options = odeset('Mass',M,'RelTol',1e-4,'AbsTol',[1e-6 1e-10 1e-6]); [t,y] = ode15s(@robertsdae,tspan,y0,options);

Plot the solution.

y(:,2) = 1e4*y(:,2); semilogx(t,y); ylabel('1e4 * y(:,2)'); title('Robertson DAE problem with a Conservation Law, solved by ODE15S');

[1] Shampine, L.F., S.
Thompson, J.A. Kierzenka, and G.D. Byrne. "Non-negative solutions of ODEs." *Applied Mathematics and
Computation*. Vol. 170, 2005, pp. 556-569.

`ode15i`

| `ode15s`

| `ode23t`

| `odeset`

- Choose an ODE Solver
- Summary of ODE Options
- Equation Solving (Symbolic Math Toolbox)