Why not making accounts creation more complicated?

6 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Cedric Wannaz
Cedric Wannaz le 6 Juin 2014
Commenté : John D'Errico le 14 Juil 2014
We've seen a dramatic increase of the spam that we get on the forum lately, and I am wondering if it isn't the right moment for increasing the complexity of accounts creation. Would it only be with two captchas, that could pretty easily be implemented : one graphical and why not, as we are on Mathworks, one mathematical (e.g. basic arithmetic with a few levels of parentheses, enough for screwing up most regexp-based parsers)?
EDIT - some arguments from my comments below
I don't really care about clicking on multiple threads to see whether they are spam or not. What I do really not like though, is to have to do it multiple times for the same user. I think that any solution which allows a same user account to send multiple posts after one has been closed or flagged as spam by a high enough rep. member, is not adequate.
If I look at the list of members with a rep above even 1000, I don't see anybody who should legitimately not be trusted about using adequately a mechanism which allows to block an account until a high rep member (2k+, 3k+,editor,admin?) decides to unblock or to cancel/delete it. This mechanism could even be limited to accounts with a rep below 25 or 50, because no spammer will ever pass this threshold (see Jon's comment about this point).
EDIT - There could/should also be a list of forbidden domain names for creating TMW accounts, typically those which allow the creation of anonymous/disposable accounts automatically. The rational is that no professional/student should have any valid reason for using such email accounts for creating a TMW account.
  35 commentaires
Cedric Wannaz
Cedric Wannaz le 10 Juil 2014
Modifié(e) : Cedric Wannaz le 10 Juil 2014
I've also seen these old accounts, reported many times already, which irritates me. If TMW takes spam very seriously (as mentioned below), there is no objective reason for keeping spammers' accounts, .. I am hoping that if we provide a list of these accounts using the official support channels, they will be deleted. But for that we need to keep track of them for a moment.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Réponses (2)

Image Analyst
Image Analyst le 6 Juin 2014
I don't think they're bots posting. I actually saw one person respond to the spammer saying that the tv/movie web sites were probably illegal and the spammer actually responded saying he didn't think so. And each account only posts 1 to 20 or so posts. So I think that actual real live people are posting , not bots. We've discussed ways before, such as suspending an account if the editors delete more than 2 posts or the account has any posts flagged as spam, but the Mathworks is keeping any possible solutions secret for now. All I know is that they're working on some kind of solution but I don't know what form that will take.
By the way, Steve's blog has a captcha where you have to do math to post a comment. And Google is famous for that, like in their help wanted ads or billboards like this:
  10 commentaires
John D'Errico
John D'Errico le 8 Juin 2014
Just for kicks, I had to look for larger primes. It is surprising that to find the first 500 digit prime in the digits of pi one only need to look as far as digits 35:534 of pi.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

John Kelly
John Kelly le 10 Juin 2014
At MathWorks we are also frustrated with the recent trend of spam being published to MATLAB Answers. It is a top priority of the MATLAB Answers Team to have more efficient spam controls in place very soon.
  5 commentaires
John D'Errico
John D'Errico le 14 Juil 2014
By the way, adding a spam tag is quite helpful for me. That way I can search for any recent spam and delete it.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by