I have a sequence of by 3 arrays, say , , , that are generated within a loop. That is, the number of rows of each array varies, but each array has three columns. The first two columns represent ordered pairs. The third column is the count of those ordered pairs. I want to "add" these together so that I get an array that accumulates the counts of these ordered pairs into a new array that is with the same structure. For example, if is
A1=[1 4 3;
3 5 1;
12 4 7;
13 5 2;
14 1 1];
and is
A1=[1 5 1;
13 5 1;
13 7 3;
14 1 5];
then the cumulative matrix should be
A=[1 4 3;
1 5 1;
3 5 1;
12 4 7;
13 5 3;
13 7 3;
14 1 6];
The arrays being "summed" in this way have hundreds of entries and are themselves summaries of arrays with thousands of entries, so efficiency matters.

 Réponse acceptée

Bjorn Gustavsson
Bjorn Gustavsson le 6 Sep 2022
One way to go about this is to use sparse:
A1 = [1 4 3;
3 5 1;
12 4 7;
13 5 2;
14 1 1];
A2 = [1 5 1;
13 5 1;
13 7 3;
14 1 5];
A_all = sparse([A1(:,1);A2(:,1)],[A1(:,2);A2(:,2)],[A1(:,3);A2(:,3)]);
[I1,I2,Val] = find(A_all);
[~,idx1] = sort(I1);
disp([I1(idx1),I2(idx1),Val(idx1)])
HTH

2 commentaires

Barbara Margolius
Barbara Margolius le 6 Sep 2022
Modifié(e) : Barbara Margolius le 6 Sep 2022
I am going to time both your answer and Bruno's to see which works best. I accepted yours because I suspect with my data it will be faster.
This will save you a sort
A1 = [1 4 3;
3 5 1;
12 4 7;
13 5 2;
14 1 1];
A2 = [1 5 1;
13 5 1;
13 7 3;
14 1 5];
A_all = sparse([A1(:,2);A2(:,2)],[A1(:,1);A2(:,1)],[A1(:,3);A2(:,3)]);
[I2,I1,Val] = find(A_all);
A = [I1,I2,Val]
A = 7×3
1 4 3 1 5 1 3 5 1 12 4 7 13 5 3 13 7 3 14 1 6

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Plus de réponses (1)

Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong le 6 Sep 2022
Modifié(e) : Bruno Luong le 6 Sep 2022
A1=[1 4 3;
3 5 1;
12 4 7;
13 5 2;
14 1 1];
A2=[1 5 1;
13 5 1;
13 7 3;
14 1 5];
A12=[A1; A2];
[A12u,~,J]=unique(A12(:,1:2),'rows','stable');
A=[A12u,accumarray(J,A12(:,3))]
A = 7×3
1 4 3 3 5 1 12 4 7 13 5 3 14 1 6 1 5 1 13 7 3

7 commentaires

Barbara Margolius
Barbara Margolius le 6 Sep 2022
Modifié(e) : Barbara Margolius le 6 Sep 2022
Thanks! Bjorn's answer also works. I am guessing his will be faster with my data, so I accepted it.
Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong le 6 Sep 2022
Modifié(e) : Bruno Luong le 6 Sep 2022
I hope you don't have such case where Bjorn's method fails
A1=[1 1 1];
A2=[1 1 -1];
or pairs are not integer >= 1.
Barbara Margolius
Barbara Margolius le 6 Sep 2022
Modifié(e) : Barbara Margolius le 6 Sep 2022
pairs are all integers (the result of floor function plus 1); third column is countdata, so should be ok.
Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong le 6 Sep 2022
floor can returns 0 no?
Barbara Margolius
Barbara Margolius le 6 Sep 2022
yup, see edit.
Bjorn Gustavsson
Bjorn Gustavsson le 6 Sep 2022
@Bruno Luong: The amount of subconsious/implicit assumptions I make when writing QD-solutions is a bit frightening.
Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong le 6 Sep 2022
That's called "intuition".

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Matrices and Arrays dans Centre d'aide et File Exchange

Produits

Version

R2022a

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by