Effacer les filtres
Effacer les filtres

How to reduce the computation time for adding 3D-array?

1 vue (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
jae lee
jae lee le 9 Déc 2020
Commenté : Bruno Luong le 7 Jan 2021
Hi, I am trying to add multiple 3D-arrays to a bigger 3D-array at a specific index (x,y,z)
Below is the code, and it does work and compute the answer but it seems very ineffecient.
In this example, i only have 4 sets of coordiantes (x,y,z) but in real code, i have more than 1e6 sets of points.
It takes very long to compute the result with that many points.
Is there any way to reduce the computation time?
Thank you in advance
Regards
J
Big=zeros(500,500,500); %%%% Bigger Array
Small=rand(250,250,250);
x=[245; 220; 256; 270];
y=[245; 220; 256; 270];
z=[245; 220; 256; 270];
for n = 1 : length(x)
x_cord=x(n)-length(Small)/2;
y_cord=y(n)-length(Small)/2;
z_cord=z(n)-length(Small)/2;
x_end= x_cord + length(Small) -1 ;
y_end= y_cord + length(Small) -1;
z_end=z_cord + length(Small) -1;
if x_end <= length(Big)
Big(x_cord:x_end, y_cord:y_end,z_cord:z_end)=Big(x_cord:x_end, y_cord:y_end,z_cord:z_end)+Small();
end
end
  2 commentaires
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson le 9 Déc 2020
could also be done with accumarray, but I am not sure that would be faster considering the time to generate the coordinate matrices... though I did just think of a shortcut for that.
jae lee
jae lee le 9 Déc 2020
Hi Walter. Thank you for your comment.
What would be the coordinate matrices??
Does it mean x,y,z?
Thank you

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Réponse acceptée

Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong le 24 Déc 2020
Modifié(e) : Bruno Luong le 24 Déc 2020
You can reformulate the loop as convolution of
A = accumarray([x(:) y(:) z(:)]-length(Small)/2,1,[500 500 500])
and
B = flip(flip(flip(Small,1),2),3)
(I left out the detail of overflowed for simplicity)
You might look at convn function. The problem I see is that A is sparse (1/125 in density) and might not be efficient as for loop.
You also might try this FEX to see if you can exploit the sparsity
Or this one using different method of compute convolution
  5 commentaires
jae lee
jae lee le 7 Jan 2021
I tried the above method but it went into the infinite loop.
A = accumarray([x(:) y(:) z(:)]-length(Small)/2,1,[500 500 500])
B = flip(flip(flip(Small,1),2),3)
C=convn(A,B);
Bruno Luong
Bruno Luong le 7 Jan 2021
You might try the alternative convolution implementations in the links I post above.
As I said above, the alternative ways I have proposed might not be fater than your for-loop.

Connectez-vous pour commenter.

Plus de réponses (1)

Amrtanshu Raj
Amrtanshu Raj le 24 Déc 2020
Hi,
You can use the parfor loop to use parallel processing and get higher computation speeds. However you will have to modify your for loop to be used for parfor loop.
Hope this helps !!

Catégories

En savoir plus sur Images dans Help Center et File Exchange

Produits


Version

R2020b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by