- Increase the inverter switching frequency (in the example 2 kHz is used) and reduce the fundamental sample time. This will slow down the simulation, but we should see less ripple from the discretization. Controllers will need retuning as well.
- Re-tune the controllers so that they meet your specific requirements. Check this example if you’re considering using the PID autotuner block: https://www.mathworks.com/help/slcontrol/ug/tune-field-oriented-controllers-for-a-pmsm-using-closed-loop-pid-autotuner-block.html
PMLSM Controller Over Active
5 vues (au cours des 30 derniers jours)
Afficher commentaires plus anciens
I started with the three phase PMLSM example: https://www.mathworks.com/help/sps/ug/three-phase-pmlsm-drive.html . I modified the outer control loop so that it regulates to a velocity set point instead of tracking position. The output scope capture shows that after some initial overshoot and undershoot it is able to maintain 0.5 m/s and then 0 m/s when a step change in the setpoint changes. However, the controller appears to be over active and the thrust and phase currents appear extremely noisy. Can someone give me some tips are troubleshooting steps to determine how to smooth out the control effort? Thank you.
0 commentaires
Réponse acceptée
Sabin
le 8 Août 2025
There are a few things you can try.
Plus de réponses (0)
Voir également
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!